<p>I told you, I didn’t post anything about URM’s with inferior scores. Just two friends. Aaaand you used “ultimatum” wrong.</p>
<p>So is the difference between a 2400 and a 2330 also statistically insignificant? </p>
<p>There is no need to make a model on SAT scores based on the mean. The data for past years is all out there. If I remember correctly, a few thousand score at each notch above 2300, though I’m guessing that it tapers off as it approaches 2400. My Stats is a bit rusty though, because I took the class last year. </p>
<p>Regardless, I’ll take your argument and apply it to my 2350 vs. a 2400: it could be a bit of a curve, combined with a careless algebra error (or two). </p>
<p>Since I didn’t mention it earlier:the highest single score I’ve gotten is a 2350. 790/760/800. Same sitting as you, I believe. 2370 is my superscore though, bumped up 20 points on the math. So I only beat you by a handful of subjective writing points. Then again, writing has a pretty generous curve usually.</p>
<p>I am merely being realistic and using self-effacing humor. I’ll do it again: I know that my cousin is in many ways better than me. She was, and still is, my role model. If she, my ideal, is not good enough for Stanford, what can a poor imitation such as I hope for? I’ve heard many other stories of Chinese kids with stats better than mine getting rejected. Yet, I should try. If I don’t try, my chances are zero. At least this way I can say I tried. My ego is big enough to try, but not big enough to believe that I would get in. I am expecting rejection a heckuva lot more than acceptance.</p>
<p>To a great extent, what colleges see is this “laundry list” of achievements. There’s no space on the app for natural awesomeness and the like. Her laundry list was longer and more impressive than mine. :P</p>
<p>I was referring to subjectives in the sense of extra-curriculars-- I mean, it’s not like my friends whipped up essays for the guy to read on the spot. We’re in the same sort of EC’s: math, sci oly, orchestra, that sort of thing. Sure, it is a somewhat unlikely situation. But, I did follow up that little bit of RL ■■■■■■■■ with a survey with the two otherwise identical stats. Did it scientifically too.</p>
<p>So why is this black kid an outlier? Why isn’t the Asian kid? And isn’t it kinda racist saying that Asians are only good at tennis? Your example of the top 100 basketball players makes the juxtaposition (lol, English term) of my friends seem like it happens all the time.</p>
<p>My cuz went to Juilliard anyways. She got into a bunch of UC’s, UChicago, Rice and Penn. WL at Harvard. Great place, she loves it, doesn’t change the fact that Stanford was her firstie.</p>
<p>And here is a laundry list of a different sort.
- Don’t make excuses for your not-perfect scores. You dun goofed. I dun goofed. Oh wellz.
- The personal attacks are irrelevant to this argument. Kthnx.
- Stop throwing out all this crap about classes you’ve taken. I’ve taken them too.
- Your use of sarcasm is heavy handed, and you seem to be unable to notice it in subtler forms. But I guess that’s okay, since this is the inflectionless internet.
- Condescension</p>
<p>@CoolRunning: I hope you’re being sarcastic. If you mean “winner” as in an euphemism for “overly assertive”, which is a euphemism for something else, then sure.</p>