<p>I copyed this article on website or UVA, just learn, how a university essay reader thinks about thousands of essays piled in front of his eyes.</p>
<hr>
<p>*Fast Food. *</p>
<p>That's what I think of when I try to draw an analogy with the process of reading application essays. </p>
<p>The bad. Ninety percent of the applications I read contain what I call McEssays - usually five-paragraph essays that consist primarily of abstractions and unsupported generalization. They are technically correct in that they are organized and have the correct sentence structure and spelling, but they are boring. Sort of like a Big Mac. I have nothing against Big Macs, but the one I eat in Charlottesville is not going to be fundamentally different from the one I eat in Paris, Peoria or Palm Springs. I am not going to rave about the quality of a particular Big Mac. The same can be said about the generic essay. If an essay starts out: "I have been a member of the band and it has taught me leadership, perseverance and hard work," I can almost recite the rest of the essay without reading it. Each of the three middle paragraphs gives a bit of support to an abstraction, and the final paragraph restates what has already been said. A McEssay is not wrong, but it is not going to be a positive factor in the admission decision. It will not allow a student to stand out.</p>
<p>A student who uses vague abstractions poured into a preset form will end up being interpreted as a vague series of abstractions. A student who uses clich</p>