<p>My kids go to a school where most kids take 4-6 AP exams on average. According to the college counselors who do track these things, it does not seem to make any difference whether you take 4 or more, and they have out and out stated this with stats to back them up in admissions decisions that they are willing to share with any parents who want to see this. I took a look myself, and have to agree. Unfortunately when you are talking about the most selective schools, most of the kids who got in were very much wanted by those schools for special talents and attributes and it seemed very clear that the number of APs was not going to be a sticking point in admissions. </p>
<p>When I lived in Westchester County, I had a friend whose D went to Scarsdale High School, and again, once you had 4 solid AP courses, it did not seem to matter as much as the grades you got. However, for those of my kids who went to Catholic schools, it seemed like everyone took APs junior and senior years, and if you did not take many of them, you were not going to look good against the rest of your class. So those kids took many APs. I will say that those schools did not seem to do so well in the AP test results whereas my S's prep school gets outstanding results even without official AP courses. So it really does depend on the situation and the school that the student is attending. Also certain "core" APs count more than others. Psychology, Human Geography, World History, Environmental Science are considered by many as AP lights. Though, my kids did take some of those as well. </p>
<p>Fire2006, I cannot emphasize enough that it so depends on the history and track record of your school. I will tell you that my son's college counselors were not happy with him with the 3 academics this year, and they really pushed for him to add Physics (he only had 2 out of the "Holy Trilogy" of physics, chem and bio), and/or a 4th year of foreign language, something he despised and his last grade in Spanish was a "C" junior year. She also would have like him to have added a government or history course and did not consider Art History in that category. I think for someone who wanted to be considered as a solid,excellent student, her advise was right on the spot, and most of the kids who were accepted to the top schools were tradiitonal in their approach and had 4 years of foreign language, the 3 major sciences, and 3 solid years of history and 4 years of math. But some of S's classmates did not take AP Calc and took some PreCalc2 or Stats or Uncalc, or Into to Calc math course with some unusual name instead of the calc that prepared you for the AP calc AB test. they seemed to fare as well as any--one accepted to Cornell, I know, another to Harvard, but they were very, very strong in their area of focus. In retrospect, I should not have insisted on the Calc course as it did develop into a thorn in our sides this year. However, he chose to take that Calc over a lighter math course and adding a science, foreign language or history course to his schedule. But it did not seem to be a problem for him that his academic course load was on the lighter side freshman year, and there were a number of other kids accepted to top schools who did the same thing. But again, I add, they did have very strong resumes in something specific and it was pretty clear that they were strongly pursuing their interests at a high level senior year. It did not look like they were taking breezers but were channeling into their passions. THey were also all very strong academically with some very concrete indicators such as very high test scores all around, or top grades, national awards, etc. I do not want anyone to take what I am saying out of context. You do have to procede with caution when you are going outside the recommended cores that the colleges post, and taking lighter course loads.</p>