<p>hard question to ask with the different test versions.... but what was your question #8 for vocab? I took a guess a picked something with a 'v' ... also, was anachronistic right for the question about hte students who were used to using their calculators?</p>
<p>I was debating between that one and Zengagel's view...</p>
<p>But the western's viewed it as 'bride price'... and Zeng whatever said it her 'freedom couldn't be brought' I couldn't chose between them :/</p>
<p>ya it was anachronistic- out of date</p>
<p>I doubt it. Anachronistic would be something that existed in the wrong time, and I don't think that's what a statement prohibiting calculators would be, however that was a hard question and I think I got it wrong. :/</p>
<p>I'm thinking anachronistic might be right, kind of, probably because a lot of the other choices were bad. It's okay, though, I didn't count on getting that question anyway.</p>
<p>oh and the first one on the Zengagel(sp) passage... which was the one she didn't touch on?</p>
<p>Yeah! the 'v' word was vituperative. That was right.</p>
<p>And it was 'unequivocable' or something not anachronistic.</p>
<p>oh well... and what about the one with the otters... i was super uncertain...</p>
<p>I said she didn't touch on academic integrity.</p>
<p>I seriously doubt it was unequivocal, how in the world would a statement stating not to use calculators seem unequivocal to a person that had used calculators constantly? It is unequivocal, but I don't see why it would seem that way. The hint in that sentence is that the students reading it had used calculators that entire time, so a word has to address that fact to be right.</p>
<p>
[quote]
I said she didn't touch on academic integrity.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>That's what I put as well.</p>
<p>it was exploittaive not adversarial</p>
<p>for it tobe adversarial they would have to be enemies, agasint each other</p>
<p>while the public did show some disdain for art, art clearly has nothing agasitn the public</p>
<p>rather it was exploitative as public was restrciting art- controlling it- exploiting it for its own causes, to see what htey wanted to, the familiar, the usual, the norm... not creative thought</p>
<p>duh</p>
<p>oh, and on one of the dual answer vocab questions.. it was something like "she didn't attack the billl directly, but rather BLANK and was eventually BLANked the bill's passage..
i think i put conciliatory and can't rememer the second answer? anyone else?</p>
<p>I didn't think any of them made that much sense either... but I guess that word made the best sense.</p>
<p>And for the actor who irritated everyone, I just remember that the second word for the second blank was unequinamity... Is that right?</p>
<p>Hey, what was the sentence that went with the question that had the 'v' option?</p>
<p>the bill one is dilatory and forestalled</p>
<p>excuse the typos</p>
<p>something about a womans critics attacking her with BLANK</p>
<p>I put dilatory and something else for that one.</p>
<p>equanimity was correct, because it means calm-tempered.</p>
<p>Does anyone know the sentence with the 'v' topic?</p>
<p>its viterpative, and dilatory</p>
<p>and mulaski will u respond to the post on expoitative vs adversarial</p>
<p>yeah it was:</p>
<p>the woman did not say that she outrightly disliked the bill. instead she made a series of DILATORY somethings that ultimately FORESTALLED the bill.</p>
<p>and for the role of art in society question, i put adversarial - art was against society - as stated in the passage, art was disrupting society and tearing it apart. it could not have been exploitative - art wasn't using society.</p>