<blockquote>
<p>MYOS1634
Thanks for your response. I could realize that for UCLA and Carleton, there’s almost no difference regarding specialization or general education requirement. I understand that I can take only 4 or 5 classes per semester, and even the number of bio classes offered by Clareton is far more than enough for me. Regarding my knowledge, I’m advanced about math and physics but not about biology right now. Yet I have taken all the AP natural science and math, so I’m advanced regarding the college credits. I believe you’re correct in saying that Carleton offers many advanced classes, since it’s one of the best science-oriented LACs and its education is usually compared with that of Ivy League schools. </p>
<p>ucbalumnus
By your advice given several months ago, I could know such schools with open curriculum and weak distribution requirements. Since Grinnell and Wesleyan have weak distribution requirements, I applied for both. However, Wesleyan is neither science-oriented nor terrific PhDer producer, I’m not sure about this school. </p>
</blockquote>