<p>S and I just completed a one-day event for admitted engineering students who have received merit scholarships. There were probably about 15 families there hosted by about an equal number of current students and at least 7-8 faculty members.</p>
<p>General campus impressions: In a beautiful part of the city, just past the Garden District and across from Audubon Park. The main quad fronts on St. Charles Avenue and consists of stone and brick buildings in a pleasing mix of traditional architectural styles. Behind the quad, the campus opens up wider into a series of other quads and sectors of both traditional and more modern buildings. Some key buildings are under construction, the new Student Center and two new residences, to be completed in early 06.. Some dorms (mostly female-only?) have that nice older architecture; the newer dorms are nothing to write home about imho. (S doesnt care if theres a computer and playstation in the room, that covers it for him). Greek is a minority % on campus I kept trying to figure who was and who wasnt, and couldnt. Walked past several Greek houses, but nothing really going on there during the day.</p>
<p>The prevailing mode of dress on campus is very casual tee shirts and shorts/jeans/jeans skirt; no noticeable pocketbook factor, carolyn ;). I have seen many questions/comments re diversity on campus the stats can be looked up and speak for themselves, but this is what I observed: Asian SU holding a food fest (all campus invited) on the evening we arrived; Hispanic engineering student org. holding a Fiesta (all campus invited) on the afternoon of our event; posters re upcoming Black Arts festival. Engineering faculty we met (largely chairs of each dept) showed much diversity (India, Greece, Hispanic origin etc.). Very friendly campus with faculty, staff, and students open and helpful and going out of their way to stop what they are doing and answer questions, point the way, etc. </p>
<p>S spent the night in dorm, which obviously went well as he was invited to stay the next night which was not part of the organized agenda. Since S has already chosen Tulane for next year, I am thrilled that he has already found a comfort zone.</p>
<p>Engineering specific impressions: Clearly a very undergrad-oriented faculty; mentioned that there are only 3 seniors to every faculty position. To pass the required fresh eng. survey course, students must have lunch w a professor and visit at least 3 eng. Research labs; many mentoring possibilities are set up with faculty, grad students and/or alums with the goal of each student being paired w a mentor. The faculty member handling this works very hard to achieve this even when it requires efforts equivalent to pulling teeth. The Dean of Engineering has an Alumni Advisory Board of 60 members (HP, Exxon-Mobil, Yahoo, Entergy etc. etc.) who meet twice a year with him and at each of those sessions have lunch with undergrad eng students. TAs are not used in engineering classes, although they are used in labs in the Calculus classes that eng students take in the Math dept. TAs do provide help sessions for some eng classes. I was most impressed by not only the credentials of the faculty but by how personable they all were a key element in approachability by students, as I see it. As each described his work/research, I found myself salivating and I am no engineer!</p>
<p>As has been said elsewhere on this Board, Tulane is reaching up in rank. Average SAT score was reported to have gone up 120 points in the last few years. One faculty member spoke of a recent graduate who had chosen Tulane over MIT, who excelled at Tulane (tho not valedictorian) and was accepted into several top MD/PhD programs after his biomedical engineering BS from Tulane. The professors analysis was that this student, by choosing and excelling at Tulane may have had better outcome than had he chosen MIT. He concluded that the top 10% of undergrads eng students at Tulane will do as well or better than had they chosen a more prestigious school; conversely, he believed that the bottom10% at Tulane would do nowhere near as well in terms of future opportunities as the bottom 10% at MIT. Perhaps obvious, but an interesting way to put it, I thought.</p>