<p>As those who read this forum know S2 chose Tulane. He did so even though he was admitted to USC, UC-Berkeley, and other higher ranking schools. Tulane was a choice, not a safety. Accordingly, I now feel that we are new members of the family who can be a little critical out of affection and a hope for improvement. I felt there were some glaring weaknesses with the DT event, and at fallenchemist's suggestion I thought I would post them.</p>
<p>The first was a definite lack of dealing with the issue of diversity. The student panel was anything but diverse. There was no real discussion of diversity or its role on campus, or the the school's attempt to ensure that various groups don't segregate themselves. That is, where Asians hang with Asians, Latinos with Latinos, African Americans with African Americans, etc. The audience was not diverse and this was a little unsettling to S2, but we understand it is only one of many audiences. Others in the audience expressed similar observations and concerns. The community is diverse and is what helped S2 feel better about the issue. S2 has attended a diverse urban HS and really likes it for that reason. He has friends from all groups and would like that to continue in college.</p>
<p>The second issue was a lack of emphasis on academics. Service was discussed, community was discussed, social life was discussed, but there really was no in-depth discussion of academics. It would have been good to have faculty representatives as well as students talking about their classroom experiences, workload, research opportunities, internship possibilities, aha! moments, faculty-student interaction, etc. None of that was really addressed by anything but passing comments.</p>
<p>Lastly, the student panel selected was not impressive. As mentioned above, it had no minority representation. Most of the panelists where from the Greek system and spoke from that perspective, which, while informative, I felt was overrepresented (not that I have anything against sororities or fraternities, S2 may join one). The panel did not speak of the academics at the school either, and when asked direct questions about academics they seemed uncomfortable. As a group, with a couple of exceptions they were not very articulate and did not present an image of the peer group many of the parents attending would find attractive for their kids. Since this is a "first impression" more care and preparation is needed when selecting and presenting the student panel.</p>
<p>The student tour-guide and the students we met randomly on campus were much better representatives of the school. We met some very passionate, engaged, and interesting students on our own. S2 is not shy when it comes to approaching people with questions. He even talked students into providing him with his own dorm tours. Likewise, S2 sought out and spoke with some professors. He was quite impressed and taken with them. One spent 20 minutes speaking to him 1:1, and invited him to his humanities class. He gave him some great advice on selecting courses and on selecting a major given his interests. S2 found the class exhilarating and on par with the course he took at UChicago. The discussion was intense, thoughtful, and based on the reading and previous discussions. Arguing without evidence was not acceptable. S2 came away convinced Tulane was for him.</p>
<p>However, had S2 not taken a certain amount of initiative, I'm not sure he would have had the same reaction. Tulane has so much to offer and is such a wonderful school, more care needs to be taken so that even if the "programmed" experience was an anomaly, such negative reflections should not have a chance to occur.</p>