<p>MIT Technology Review has named the top 35 young innovators from nominees around the world. Two of the 35 are from USC. They are Jernej Barbic and Bhaska Krishnamachari. </p>
<p>Only IBM, Stanford and USC had two honorees this year.</p>
<p>Congratulations....</p>
<p>Bump to front page…</p>
<p>Congratulations!! So proud!</p>
<p>Actually, a big correction. USC has three people in T35 technology review, not two. One of them, Dan Berkenstock, is just not a current student so he isn’t listed as “USC” next to his name. He is still a Trojan though. </p>
<p>With that said, USC unfortunately does not have the top number of representatives in MIT’s Tech Review because Stanford has a total of four. Brian Gerkey and Piya Sorcar are also from Stanford who were not listed as such in the article. </p>
<p>Thought I would throw that tidbit in there.</p>
<p>gOld3n,</p>
<pre><code>It you read the original post again please note it was never claimed SC had the top number of innovators. I wrote SC was tied with IBM and Stanford.
By the way how many did UCLA have?
</code></pre>
<p>I never said you did claim USC had the highest, just pointing out it wasn’t tied with Stanford as Stanford has the highest and USC actually has higher than IBM. Not my problem in the slightest if USC kids get butthurt at the slightest correction from a fellow Los Angeles college student. </p>
<p>And as for your UCLA question, UCLA had zero in the top 35, but if you would like for me to link to you other similar and well respected faculty and/or student distinctions for colleges (I assume you are interested because you asked for UCLA after all), particularly in the medical field, where UCLA makes USC look like a community college let me know.</p>
<p>Have a great day! :)</p>