<p>This should put to rest the myth that students there are some of the most dissatisfied in the nation.</p>
<p>It seems to compare apples and oranges. a LAC is a completely different animal from a RU–not to even to the issue of Service Academies. I wish Forbes would just demarcate their lists a bit better. Even if it the quality of undergraduate education, again, one persons small intimate environment is another persons inability to be in a world famous lab. Neither are better-- just different. UC is excellent for what it is. It will never be Williams or West Point, nor should it ever aspire to. (BTW to place Claremont-McKenna higher than Yale is just plain weird, I’m sorry–just weird.)</p>
<p>And if it college student satisfaction-- Pepperdine where the student are literally on the Malibu beach has everyone else beat hands down :-)</p>
<p>If you pry apart the list into colleges and research universities, it looks a lot more conventional.</p>
<p>Forbes is uncapable of proving anything. It’s so flawed that it can’t be taken seriously.</p>
<p>i heard that Forbes sales have gone up in Williamstown, MA.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>And it very well should have. Gotta love those Ephs!</p>
<p>This would be a good PR for UChicago:
[The</a> Most EXPENSIVE Colleges (PHOTOS): Forbes List](<a href=“The Most EXPENSIVE Colleges (PHOTOS): Forbes List | HuffPost College”>The Most EXPENSIVE Colleges (PHOTOS): Forbes List | HuffPost College)</p>
<p>You pay $58k to read The Blagojevich Diary.</p>