<p>UCLA is giving me a lot of financial aid. In addition, they gave me the Achievement Scholarship of $10,000 (renewable every year) as long as I remain in good academic standing (above a 2.0) and the Alumni Freshman Award of $1,000 (renewable every year). Combining all of the financial aid I received, I have a full ride to UCLA (including personal expenses, books and supplies, transportation, health insurance, etc). For Brown University, I have an EFC of $5320 (not including traveling), but I also am required to purchase their Brown Health Insurance (of $3225) since my health insurance ends this year once I turn 19 (I turn 19 this year). The HI is NOT part of my Financial Award package, so the HI is an addition, so I would need to take out an estimate of between $9,000 - $10,000 for Brown every year (for personal expenses, etc)</p>
<p>I have the dilemma of now knowing what to choose. My family is completely against me going to Brown University and will not support me financially (one, they are against me going, and two, we literally do not have the money for it since we live check by check). I am the first student ever in my hypersegregated Latino/ Hispanic school to get admitted into an Ivy League (I am a first-generation Latina student) and get a full ride to a UC, so mostly everyone at school is pushing me to go to Brown. My family is pushing me to go to UCLA.</p>
<p>At this point, I am ignoring their feedback because no one but one teacher that I deeply confide in is giving me the pros and cons of each option. I would be content in whatever of the two that I choose to go to. They all fell in as my top ranked schools. </p>
<p>Here are the pros and cons for each of my options:</p>
<p>UCLA
Pros:
- full ride (includes all personal expenses such as books and supplies, travel, meal plan and dorm, health insurance, etc)
- been on the campus before
- California resident
- government internships in LA (I want to be politically involved)
- undergraduate economics rank is higher than Brown's
- close to home (I can continue internships without having to travel during the summer)
- no work-study needed to pay for school
- I am an Alumni Scholar (meaning I get priority enrollment, housing, networks, etc.)</p>
<p>Cons:
- large class sizes (it will be less interactive and more lecture-based for my first two years)
- rank of school compared to Brown
- not as much academic support as Brown (you have to advocate more for help and should not depend on having your professor or student-teacher go to you if you need help)
- quarter system (fast-paced and stressful)</p>
<p>Brown University
Pros:
- prestige, reputation and rank higher than UCLA (Ivy League)
- many different networks and internships than UCLA
- small class sizes
- good academic support
- easy access to getting classes
- Open Curriculum
- access to career choices in the East Coast (a lot of political involvement due to peer connections and organizations)</p>
<p>Cons:
- never been on the campus before (can't go to ADOCH) or the East Coast
- cold weather is bad for my heart condition (my blood doesn't circulate well in my body, so my limbs turn numb, purple and get really painful under drastic cold temperatures) so I would need to by really good winter clothing (will need more $ for that)
- work-study needed (it is part of my financial aid package, so it will not cover my EFC) so less time to network
- no family support whatsoever
- student contribution increases to over $3000 after my freshman year (it is required for ALL Brown students to pay for the student contribution regardless of financial needs)</p>
<p>I tried convincing Brown's financial aid office about matching what UCLA has given me, but nothing can be fixed since my scholarships are merit and not need-based (Brown doesn't negotiate when comparing merit-based scholarships, ONLY need-based). They also cannot cover for my Health Insurance. I am currently trying to see what other health options I have. The largest subsidized loan that they can give me is about $4,500 (Stafford Loan). The rest would need to be covered with subsidized loans, so interest will accumulate. </p>
<p>My biggest plan is to go to law school after my undergraduate degree. I want to go to Berkeley's School of Law since UC Berkeley was my dream school (I got accepted to UC Berkeley for my undergraduate but I am not going because my expenses for it is equal to Brown's of about $9,000 - $10,000 a year). I will need to take out loans for my law degree, and yearly tuition for most law schools range between $45,000 - $50,000 (in-state) or $50,000 - $60,000 (out-of-state).</p>
<p>Most people say that where you go for your undergrad does not matter as much as your graduate degree. I do not want to have more debt when going to law school. But, I do not know if passing the opportunity to go to an Ivy League will be a mistake. </p>
<p>What other factors should I consider for both schools? What do you all reason I should choose and why?</p>