<p>
</p>
<p>The “increase” is a result of an ‘accounting adjustment’ and is not really an increase in the number of available positions. Last year NRMP required an “all in” for residency programs–either they offered all of their programs and positions thru the NRMP are they were entirely excluded from participating in the Match. Prior to last year a small group of specialties (urology, opthalmology, derm) held their own private matches and did not enter their residency slots into the general match. That is no longer permitted.</p>
<p><a href=“http://b83c73bcf0e7ca356c80-e8560f466940e4ec38ed51af32994bc6.r6.cf1.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/NRMP-First-Year-Graduate-Medical-Education-in-the-United-States-2002-20131.pdf”>http://b83c73bcf0e7ca356c80-e8560f466940e4ec38ed51af32994bc6.r6.cf1.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/NRMP-First-Year-Graduate-Medical-Education-in-the-United-States-2002-20131.pdf</a></p>
<p>In fact, if you look at the NRMP data, you’ll see the number of year-to-year increases has been small, typically a few hundred per year at most. Thats’s not enough to keep up with the number of new MD and DO programs coming online and producing grads.</p>
<p>The number of Medicare funded positions essentially has not changed since 1999. Any increase in residency training positions are because these positions are either state funded (our state governor just signed a bill to fund 7 additional resident positions in FM yesterday) or NIH funded. </p>
<p><a href=“https://www.aamc.org/advocacy/gme/71178/gme_gme0012.html”>https://www.aamc.org/advocacy/gme/71178/gme_gme0012.html</a></p>
<p>NIH funded residency spots are in a precarious position since the NIH had it budget severely reduced (close to 35% total) twice in the last 2 years and many research programs are being defunded, including those which support resident training positions.</p>
<p>The number of state funded residency training positions lag behind the number of medical grad produced by each state. TX, for example, would need to fund an additional 500 residency training positions just accommodate every medical graduate it produces each year.</p>
<p>The availability of US rotation positions for non-US students has come under scrutiny and in some places (NY,NJ, TX) legislation is being drafted to prohibit any hospital that receives public funds from accepting any fees for training non US educated med students for clinical rotations. I don’t know if you understand how clinical rotation are arranged? Students do clinicals either at their own institution and its associated hospitals/clinics or at an institution with which the sending school has a reciprocal agreement. Basically every US allopathic medical school has a reciprocity agreement with every other school (and their associated hospitals) in the US. Students ( who attend a medical school that does not participate in the reciprocity pay a fee (typically in the $3000-$15000 range per student per rotation) to the receiving hospital. Since training a student during a clinical rotation costs a hospital thousands of dollars, there’s no reason why any hospital would accept a non-reciprocal student without any reimbursement for its expenses.</p>
<p>Currently only half of ECFMG-eligible IMGs match into any residency, even after multiple attempts. IMGs who want to match in US residencies need to have significantly higher USMLE scores than US educated med grads need to match into the same specialty & location.</p>
<p>I stand by my assertion–IMGs who want to return and practice in the US face increasing competition for a limited number of residency positions. Please see these articles:</p>
<p><a href=“http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1475200”>http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1475200</a></p>
<p><a href=“http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1306445?viewType=Print&viewClass=Print&”>http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1306445?viewType=Print&viewClass=Print&</a></p>
<p>The NEJM article details the sharp increase in DO school enrollment due to the opening of new schools (over 125% since 2005). Since the ACGME and AOA have reached an accord unifying the DO and MD residency match, this means there will be even more competition for a limited number of residency positions.</p>
<p>By 2017, there will be over 28,000 new US medical grads entering the match. Unless Congress or various state legislatures sharply increase the funding for residency training, the number of US grads will exceed the number of available residency positions (~27,000).</p>