<p>Wow, so many posts on this thread…many of them juicy little morsels! ;)</p>
<p>Anyhoo, the OP, Michigan and WUSTL are very different universities. Both are excellent and have world-renowned medical centers, but that is where the similarities end. Quoting rankings is pointless. Those “international rankings” and the USNWR College rankings tend to be flawed and attempt to create forced rankings where they truly are not required. How (and why) does one differentiate between the top 20 or 30 universities in a country where you have hundreds of established and accredited institutions of higher learning. </p>
<p>In a nation that is as large as the US, there are literally dozens of excellent universities and it is virtually impossible to rank them with any degree of accuracy. Suffice it to say, Michigan and WUSTL are both elite universities. WUSTL’s peers are mid-sized research universities such as Brown, Emory, Johns Hopkins, Notre Dame, Rice and Vanderbilt. Michigan’s peers are larger research universities such as Cornell, Northwestern, Penn, UC-Berkeley, UIUC, UT-Austin and Wisconsin-Madison.</p>
<p>Where your majors are concerned, Michigan is generally ranked in or around the top 10 nationally. WUSTL is not as highly rated in those fields. Department rankings should not be taken in a vaccum of course. As BearCub points out, Purdue is ranked higher than Princeton in Engineering, but it would be unwise to choose Purdue over Princeton for one’s undergraduate studies because Princeton is significantly stronger than Purdue overall and only slightly weaker than Purdue in Engineering. But that comparison does not apply to Michigan vs WUSTL. In terms of overall quality, Michigan and WUSTL are roughly equal, but in terms of the strengths of their Engineering and Physics departments, Michigan is considered stronger than WUSTL.</p>
<p>But the above should not be the sole basis for choosing one over the other. Below are some metrics I would use to make my decision. Those would address the more important criteria of “fit” rather than attempt to establish which university is “better” when it is clear that such an attempt is futile.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Michigan is a large public university while WUSTL is a mid-sized private university. As such, there are going to be sublte differences between the two. The reason why the differences are subtle is because Michigan is more like a private university than most public universities. But there are still differences between them. WUSTL will have slightly smaller classes, particularly at introduction level classes. Michigan will also feel a lot larger and less intimate than WUSTL. Some people like the cozy atmosphere offered at WUSTL while others prefer the vastness of the University of Michigan.</p></li>
<li><p>Michigan is located in Ann Arbor (considered one of the quintiscential college towns) while WUSTL is in one of the nicest areas of St Louis, a large but not so-pleasant city.</p></li>
<li><p>60% of Michigan undergrads are residents of the state, compared to just 10% at WUSTL. This pertains more to Americans than international students, but it is worth considering. At WUSTL, over 50% of students come from outside the region (Midwest), compared to only 25% at Michigan. that is not to say that Michigan has no geographic diversity since it has over 5,000 undergrads who from coast US states such as New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Florida, Texas and California. However, as a percentage of the overall student population, WUSTL will be more diverse.</p></li>
<li><p>Athletics play a significant role in Michigan’s campus life. Its football and hockey programs are two of the most successful in all of college sports and Michigan stadium seats over 112,000, making it the largest stadium in the US. Sports do not play as large a role in campus life at WUSTL. Many find Michigan’s athletic tradition off-putting while others feel it adds to the campus culture.</p></li>
<li><p>Another thing to consider is the Chinese population at those two schools. At Michigan, 6% of the undergraduate student population (1,700 in total) is international and of those, more than one third (602) come from China/Hong Kong. That is a huge number. WUSTL only has 350 international students in total, and I doubt that more than 100 of those are Chinese. If you include graduate students, the number increases dramatically. Michigan has 3,500 international graduate students, and of those, more than one quarter (980)come from China/Hong Kong. Altogether, Michigan has 1,582 students at Michigan come fron China or Hong Kong. Having so many students from your native China will probably make it easier for you to adjust to living in the US. Many of those students will graduate and return to China. I know Michigan’s alumni association in China is very large and very active. President Mary Sue Coleman often makes trips to China. Clearly, Michigan’s reputation on China is strong and goes way back. I think Michigan was one of the first US universities to establish formal ties with China over 100 years ago. I am not sure how WUSTL does on this front, but I do not think it can match Michigan.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>At any rate, one cannot go wrong with either of those two universities. Both are excellent and will provide you with a unique and special experience. The trick is to choose the school that fits you better. </p>
<p>Good luck!</p>