<p>Sakky and I have been debating this issue (more or less) to death over on the "Harvard Law School" thread. I recommend you check it out. </p>
<p>While my point on the thread is that you can get into HLS from anywhere, Sakky has convinced me that law school generally would be a safer bet from an Ivy. There appears to heavy grade inflation, particularly at Harvard, so if I had the chance to go there (or most other Ivies), I would, regardless of cost. There are simply too many benefits to attending Harvard, Dartmouth, etc., to turn it down for pure financial reasons. (Strong alumni network, life-long cachet, etc.) </p>
<p>Of course, attending an Ivy is no guarantee of admission to HLS or anywhere else -- but it will give you a very good shot at attending a top school, I would think. Your grades should be decent, given the inflation, and decent grades, along with a good LSAT and your undergrad pedigree, will probably get you in the door. (A good LSAT is a prerequiste regardless, obviously.) As Sakky has noted, while it may be easier to excel at UNC, it also might be easier to screw up in a few classes, leading to a lower overall GPA, and a less presitious undergrad on the application.</p>
<p>However, I would not extend this analogy to schools like Georgtown, or even Chicago. I don't believe those schools have the same kind of grade inflation, and I also don't think they carry as much weight on the application as Harvard, etc. Rather, I think they're viewed more comparably to schools like UNC, which is of course an excellent university either way. </p>
<p>Therefore, if it's a choice between Harvard (Yale, Princeton, etc.) and UNC, I would take Harvard. If it's a choice between Gtown and UNC, and I wanted to save $$, I would take UNC.</p>