<p>Many schools take academic rank into account, either as part of a subjective wholesome evaluation of the application or as a part of an automated objective "score." Of course, rank is an important statistic because it demonstrates how well a student performs with respect to his or her peers in the same environment, be it a grade-inflated school or an extremely competitive and difficult school. A natural assumption would be that rank would be based off of weighted GPAs, because doing so would prevent students lacking advanced coursework from ranking higher than students with more difficult classes. If anything, a B in an AP class should mean more than an A from a regular class, but that's a different topic.</p>
<p>My school, meanwhile, ranks students based off of unweighted GPAs. I seriously am at a loss as to why this is the standard, but regardless, the inevitable result of having a very high number of students without difficult classes ranking high is present. Even though my true, "weighted rank" would probably be around 10-15/400, I am ranked a miserable 45/400 as an applicant to MIT, Caltech, and Stanford.</p>
<p>How do these schools, and other schools for that matter, take this into account? They can't possibly weight every student's GPA from that school and create a new rank for the applicant based off of that. Do they simply disregard rank in that case? Or do they use the provided (unfair) unweighted rank? Do I have a chance if I'm not in the top 10%?</p>
<p>To the best of my knowledge, there have been attempts to have our school rank by W, but all have failed... >:-(</p>
<p></p>