<p>In looking at some of the ratings for CC, I'm just going to say that I wouldn't trust what they say 100%. It's a student survey, nothing more, nothing less. I have a hard time trusting a ranking of colleges that has a B- as it's lowest grade for any school academically. Overall, I think a better school than UR, but for undergraduate business, I think UR is every bit as good.</p>
<p>As to the rankings you cite, UR was the former #1 Master's school in the South for 12 years running. Two years ago, they were placed in the LAC category. Two years ago, we also enacted a near $10,000 tuition increase, which killed our admission numbers/scores and our new "peers" are still unfamiliar with UR, so we've received low scores. This year, we have a record high number of applicants, so that will help our admission numbers, and I believe that as the new "peer" institutions find out more about UR, you'll see their peer assessment go up. Prior to the change in categories, we were receiving peer assessments of 4.1/4.2. 34 was a disappointing ranking for everyone and the general expectations are that we will increase our position. </p>
<p>WSJ's "feeder school" does carry some weight, but my argument with that is that is only takes into account the students going to the top 15 grad schools. For example, I have a job right out of school that has huge upside potential in both opportunity and compensation, so I don't want to leave it to get my MBA. Needless to say, my MBA opportunities are limited because I want to keep my job while I'm going to school, so I won't be going to a top 15 grad school. Additionally, most of the schools on that list have a top grad school associated with the school, and a lot of the undergrads filter into that program. UR has a decent grad B-school, decent law school and no med school. Small thing, but Duke is #6 on that list, which is still amazing and something you all should be proud of. </p>
<p>Washington Monthly's current cover story is "The Secret Lives of Washington's Power Couples." I think I'll ignore college rankings of publications that sound more like something my girlfriend would pick up in the checkout lane of Kroger's. I will highlight something more credible, the Princeton Review. Keep in mind that this is for undergraduate education only.</p>
<p>"The Princeton Review has rated the University of Richmond ahead of Harvard for academics in its 2005 edition of The Best 357 Colleges. </p>
<p>Each year, The Princeton Review ranks the top 10 percent of colleges nationally in four categories—academics, campus life, selectivity and financial aid. On a scale of one to 99, Richmond scored 96 for academics, while Harvard scored 94.</p>
<p>Each college’s ratings are based primarily on surveys of its students and administrators, according to the publication: “Factors weighed included how many hours students studied and the quality of the students the school attracts as measured by admissions statistics; we also considered students’ assessments of their professors’ abilities and helpfulness.”</p>
<p>In addition to its impressive academic rating, Richmond earned exceptionally high marks for campus life (94) and student selectivity (97). The University’s financial aid rating was 79."</p>
<p>Nowhere did I or other UR posters say that UR was better than Duke. I simply highlighted my school's academic reputation, especially the business school. I find it humorous that most of the posts from Duke posters attempt to bash UR, while the UR posters have said nothing but positive things for their own school. </p>
<p>I hope you enjoy your visit to UR this weekend. It looks like it's shaping up to be a nice weekend. </p>
<p>Oh, an additional reason your son may want to go to UR...our football team is better than Duke's.<br>
<a href="http://richmondspiders.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/recaps/090206aaa.html%5B/url%5D">http://richmondspiders.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/recaps/090206aaa.html</a></p>