<p>i’m pretty sure it was. the basically asked why Drudge was mentioned. And the author mentioned Drudge to point out how public figures don’t have to address internet bloggers/gossipers and can disregard them, yet, they cannot fully disregard them because actual news reports(ex. Washington Post) can create stories from this sort of gossip.</p>
<p>@classiclays -</p>
<p>i think an answer choice was to counterbalance.</p>
<p>It was not because the National Enquirer failed to verify accuracy. It was because a specified group of “gossipers” read it. It said that a sentence after.</p>
<p>what graceee said is what i put…in fact it made the claim that the national enquirer MIGHT’VE even BEEN truthful</p>
<p>1) So was the “want” question definitely that she felt responsible? That’s what I had but I changed it to the “selfish” answer…no idea why. ):
2) What were the other choices with the “Loquacity” question?
3) What were any (preferably all) of the choices with the Idiosyncratic question? I had it right but might have changed it last minute so i’d like to know the other choices…</p>
<p>for the censorship passage, i put one answer that was like “passage 1 emphasizes the limitations of schoolteachers while passage 2 says …” did anyone else get that one?</p>
<p>I absolutely hated the reading passages. The cyber gossip and gardening killed me. My morale dropped like no other. Sad thing is, I thought vocab was a piece of cake. :(</p>
<p>Lucas, I got that too.</p>
<p>Yeah that’s right. the text never mentioned the credibility of national enquirer, so the only option is that not everyone reeds it, only a small group of people.</p>
<p>A list of the more contentious questions might be a good idea…</p>
<p>1.) Genuine----> Hearfelt or Actual?
2.)Purpose of “Co-evolution” paragraph----> Develop counter arguement, Explain through illustration, (possibly others?)?
3.)Why Drudge example was given----> Credible sources are inclined to report his articles or complexity of cyber gossip?</p>
<p>That’s all I have for now, please expand on this list!</p>
<p>tjhsst: “people who can’t read strongly” I think anyone who uses this phrase is, by definition, stupid</p>
<p>I’ll bet a hundred dollars I did better than you.</p>
<p>tactless, pathetic</p>
<ol>
<li>Heartfelt</li>
<li>Not sure</li>
<li>Complexity</li>
</ol>
<p>well for comparing the censorship passages I put that passage 2 was more measured. any comments?</p>
<p>For the Indian girl passage, was the last line hopeful? I don’t even want to remember my answers on gossip and gardening…</p>
<p>yeah that was hopeful</p>
<p>Any predictions for this:
7-8 wrong
2 omit</p>
<p>:</p>
<p>Genuine: Actual
Purpose of “Co-evolution” paragraph: Explain through illustration
Why Drudge example was given: complexity of cyber gossip
Last question for Indian passage: Hopeful</p>
<p>These are the answers that I got.</p>
<p>in the censor one… did anyone else get the one where passage 1 emphasizes the limitations of schoolteachers while passage 2 does something different?
Also got “passage 1 criticizes a topic harshly while passage 2 is more moderate/balanced.”</p>
<p>It was illustrate a point- complexity of gosssip on the internet- and the consensus on the bees one was agent (one who acts for another). Heartfelt was the right answer too.</p>
<p>that’s cool i wasn’t quite sure about it</p>