<p>@rl It was something about historical landmarks and preservationists.</p>
<p>Speaking of which the one with the question about the “Landowners will be pleased to find that it would increase the value of their property” was the answer remove it from the essay?</p>
<p>Mindy, completely agree with your daughter. I had the same things, and I think I aced the architecture one, and got 1-2 wrong on the tech one (which luckily turned out to be experimental)</p>
<p>were 19 and 22 both Es?
i think 19 was something about geese.
and for the very last question of the very last section, was the answer “you practice”? (or “to practice”?)</p>
<p>For the schools teaching certain languages:
I put ‘Were schools’ teaching… because the rest of the sentence was a ‘would have’ clause. Conditional and past go together.</p>
<p>How about the English and Scottish flag combining question: I put
Combined English stripes AND Scottish stripes</p>
<p>Another choice replaces AND with “also with”</p>
<p>another option: “was a combination of …”</p>
<p>How about the building where it said “were innovations of their time” I put D which identifies their and it should be its, because the antecedent is that Russian building.</p>
<p>does anyone remember the specific phrasing of the “practice” question?
I remember “you practice” being the only one that made any syntactic sense</p>
<p>Its definitely “you practice”. That’s a test of English subjunctive and that is correct. If you know Spanish, you can see how it would carry over well into English</p>
<p>@goodscores
how does “do practice” work at all?
i recall the sentence as something like “…that, dependent clause, practice”
if you take out the dependent clause, how does “that do practice” make sense grammatically?</p>