<p>^ I have a very distinct memory of the first time I heard the term “we will meet 100% of your need…”</p>
<p>It was at the first college-info session we attended with our oldest (now-USC-student) when she was a freshman in high school. The info session happened to be for MIT, but having attended dozens since then, I can say it was typical of all of them. We sat down for the presentation and I thumbed through the flyers until I came across the one that said “$49,367 per year…” at which point I fell off my chair and had to be splashed with cold water.</p>
<p>I had NO idea college costs had increased so much since I had attended approx two decades earlier. I wanted to leave at that point, but we were right up front and could not make a graceful exit. During the presentation they in essence said, “Don’t worry about the sticker price, we will meet 100% of your need…” I immediately defined for myself my need as: “$49,367 per year,” and then raised my hand and asked, “Who decides how much I need?” And thus began my odyssey into the quagmire of financial aid that has brought me to this typing-my-fingers-to-the-bone-point.</p>
<p>I recall the approximately 22 1/2 year-old-MIT-graduate who was doing the presentation (who had graduated approximately 23 minutes prior to the session) saying these actual words: “Well, they will look at your income and see how much you can comfortably afford…”</p>
<p>For those of us who have actually seen our EFC displayed for the first time as we complete our first FAFSA, we can tell you that the words “comfortably afford” are the exact opposite of what it is. For those who have not yet seen their actual EFC, have cold water handy and try not to fall off your chair…</p>
<p>Anyway as you can probably tell, I tend to research things thoroughly so by the time my then-freshman was applying to college we had a strong strategy in place to apply to colleges that would be most likely to offer a combination of need and/or merit aid that would make four years of attendance possible. She applied to 7 schools, including 2 state schools (UCLA and UCB) that we knew we could afford. She was accepted to all 7 and all presented packages of merit or need-based aid that would make it UNcomfotably possible to attend, but POSSIBLE. USC was the third most affordable, with Santa Clara offering a full-ride and UCLA offering merit that brought our costs to about $3,000/year less than USC. Berkeley and Oxy were both about $4,000 more/ year than USC. (She lost interest in MIT soon after that first info session and did not apply, so I cannot tell you how “comfortable” their package might have felt… )</p>
<p>The packages were not a surprise, because we had done our homework. We knew what they would consider in determining our “need” (and it turns out MY calculation of us “needing” $49,367 per year was not considered at ALL) and we had established what we were willing to pay and discussed it with our student LONG before the applications were sent.</p>
<p>Since then we encountered some of the economic downturn that everyone seems to be hit with these days, and USC stepped up to the plate and offered our kid more for her third year of attendance than either of the first two. I am very very grateful, and feel MY experiences with USC financial aid are every bit as valuable as anyone else’s on this forum :)</p>