I was admitted to both colleges and visited both last weekend, I was there for PAW (pride admit weekend) for UCLA and Bruin’s Day.
I’m planning to be a pre-med neuroscience major and am having a really tough time deciding between the two, but i’m leaning more towards UCLA (just got a better overall vibe from it, seems like I would fit in more), but I received no financial aid from UCLA (tuition would be ~$60,000 since I am out of state and I got the presidential scholarship from USC since I am a national merit finalist, bringing my tuition from $67,000 to $36,000). My parents are well-off and can afford UCLA, but of course they want me to go to USC because it will be cheaper. I also applied for the Freshman Science Honors Program (FSH) at USC (it’s only 1 year though) and am waiting for the decision on April 26th. If I attend UCLA I’ll probably go to the summer institute (CSI) to get a head start on my classes (6 weeks, you take 2 classes, planning to take writing and chem).
Here are my pros/cons so far:
UCLA
pros:
-best food
-safe neighborhood
-good fit for me
-well-known, worldwide reputation
-better science program (?)
cons:
-larger class sizes
-higher cost
-state school, affected by state economy
USC
pros:
-flat campus, can bike
-private school, more resources, pretty fancy
-smaller class size
-average food
cons:
-bad neighborhood
-not really a good fit for me (? I think, felt a little out of place there)
-more well-known for business, film, music than science
-reputation as party school (? don’t know how this compares to UCLA)
also, the LGBT community (size and things like that) is pretty important to me, both schools are very open and accepting obviously but I feel like it has a larger presence at UCLA. Personally, I would choose UCLA if money was not a factor but is it really worth the extra $120,000 in the long run over USC? I don’t want to feel like I’m wasting my parent’s money. The main deciding factors for me are student life and education.
What do you guys think?