@sushiritto U.S. News is likely just not that up to date with its info. USC actually had over 56K applications this most recent cycle… so still #1. But clearly BC is close behind, as you suggest. Even if USC is #2 vs #1, my point remains the same… USC being one of the most sought after private universities in terms of the # of total applicants… and with a higher percentage of those total applications coming from across the nation.
https://news.usc.edu/119065/trojan-family-welcomes-8980-exceptional-students-for-fall-2017-admission/
I also doubt that many non-Californians even realize that UCs limit non-CA acceptances. I certainly was not aware of such. But then again, my kids were not interested in applying to any UCs. Most applicants apply thinking that they will get in or hoping so. I doubt that those truly interested in attending UCLA are refraining from applying simply out of fear of being denied due to some cap related to them being residents of other states. Schools like U. Texas and U. Virginia likely then do the same, but it certainly did not discourage my kids or their friends from applying to those schools as Florida residents. I do not see the average applicant being discouraged from even applying as you suggest. And I certainly do no think that UCLA’s applications are therefore automatically dampered by applicants from the other 49 states arbitrarily self-evaluated there chances and voluntarily refraining from applying. It is just as likely that they aren’t that interested in attending there.
Also… my daughter did not say that those 4 colleges are on par with each other. A friend of hers, a current high school senior, thinks it. But I do know of kids who got in to Stanford & then turned Stanford down to go elsewhere. And I am quite sure that most Californians would perceive Stanford to be superior to the schools they chose. Thankfully, applicants get to apply and then choose themselves among the schools they were accepted to… and they do not need to answer to anyone else.
@KTJordan78 Well, various ranking sources like US News, Niche, Forbes, Wall Street Journal, etc. rank USC higher. And you have mentioned other sources ranking UCLA higher. I really could not care less about such rankings. My kids and their friends have never cited a single ranking source when explaining where they wanted to attend – other than Niche’s, as those student reviews do seem to sway them. None have ever mentioned the Princeton Review - period. Many applicants care a great deal more about the perceived quality of student life than any ranking related to comparative academic standing. Yes… they do want it to be at an elite / well-respected school… - of course, but then they also care about weather, campus, dorms, school infrastructure and resources, school spending on improvements, school spirit, athletic reputation, greek life, alumni network strength, internships/jobs, etc. And most that I am aware of also want it to be a private school. When all those considerations get melded together, that is how schools like USC, Duke and Vanderbilt start seeming a lot more appealing than the Ivies and schools like Carnegie Melon that fail to provide all that they are seeking… all the elements that combine together to generate the total college experience. It certainly factored in to my own daughter choosing USC over Princeton, Emory, Rice, etc. I attended Johns Hopkins and visited friends while in college at many similar schools. I certainly wanted more for my kids than the limited college experience I received. I purposely urged them to consider schools like Duke, UVa, Northwestern, Vanderbilt and USC instead.
But overall… I have been talking about the “perception” of USC vs UCLA in terms of my spheres of influence in the Eastern U.S. I am not hung up on rankings or comparisons. But those who are can clearly cite where USC does well too. Or those UCLA-backers who feel compelled to are free to continue citing rankings that favor UCLA if that is your thing.
If you are a current applicant or future applicant, my advice is to barely consider rankings at all. Sure… maybe you would like your future college to be deemed Top-50 or maybe Top-100. But other than some general benchmark, the real factors influencing your decision should be extremely personal. Visit your finalist schools in-person. Think about it all… academic reputation - especially in your field of interest, campus, climate/weather, social life, extracurricular options/activities, the arts, athletics, alumni networking, career placement, etc., etc., etc. And then choose wisely based on factors important to you and/or your family. Four years is a long time, and you only get one shot at making those four years the best possible. So please choose wisely. And good luck…