<p>I am in the process of making a decision as to which graduate school to attend for my M. Arch. I have narrowed it down to University of Southern California, and Washington University in St. Louis. I am torn between the two for various reasons. Financially USC would be better for me because of the scholarship they are offering, and the fact that the program is only 2 years. Even though rent is higher there, I wouldn't have to be there as long. WashU is only slightly more expensive, even considering rent, because the program would be 2.5 years. </p>
<p>Initially I was set on WashU when I first heard from them. But I eventually heard from USC, and began to consider California more. Apart from finances, I want to get the most out of my graduate school experience. That means not only a good program but a new environment altogether. I've lived in the Midwest my whole life, and want to be able to get out while I'm still young enough to get those experiences. But I've never lived in a major city before so I'm a little hesitant to dive into LA, when WashU could be a more subtle transition, but a new experience nonetheless.</p>
<p>And then there's the programs. I have mixed feelings about both programs, liking different things about each. Any suggestions overall about what to do would be great!</p>