<p>Hey, I got your private message, but apparently you need 15 posts to send pms so I am just going to reply here. </p>
<p>I did go to Rice and enjoyed my time there, but I ended up transferring to UT Austin. </p>
<p>As for your decision, if I were you, I would just go to UT Austin. Berkeley and Rice are not worth the extra cost. All three schools are great schools and the education you get will be more or less the same. The earning potential will also be the same with a degree from any of the 3 schools. How much you learn does not depend on what school you go to, but on how hard you are willing to work. Rankings mean very little and you should never base a decision on that especially in this case where all three schools are very good. </p>
<p>Also, you can definitely do both Turing Scholars and ECE. It will be a lot of work, but if you can do it, I highly recommend you do it. </p>
<p>For finding a job, UT has something called EXPO, which is an engineering career fair that occurs in both the Fall and Spring and a ton of companies come. EXPO is way bigger than the career fair at Rice like it is not even worth comparing. EXPO takes up the Erwin Center and lasts two days. Even over two days, there are so many companies that it is difficult to get to all the ones you want to talk to. </p>
<p>For caliber of students, I would say Rice has the highest caliber of students on average because it is a private school and has higher standards for admission. That said, the best students at UT Austin and Berkeley are all very smart and can easily compete with students from any school in the nation. </p>
<p>Also, if you are interested in grad school, the top schools will not care which of these 3 schools you went to. If you want to pursue a PhD, the only thing they care about is your ability to do research and recommendations (and to a certain extent, your GPA and coursework). </p>
<p>Basically, go to UT Austin. It is simply not worth it to pay so much to go to Berkeley or Rice.</p>