<p>This week I was accepted into UVA, Wake Forest, and U of Michigan. I also have acceptances from VaTech and GaTech. Still waiting on William and Mary, and Cornell(A bit of a reach.)(rejected from UPenn, UofChicago and WashU)</p>
<p>I am an american-born-asian from Northern VA. I'm considering majoring in Economics (Doctorate later? too early to decide). I qualify for in-state at UVA and VaTech(and W&M), but lets assume that money is not an issue.</p>
<p>So what do you all think of this set? Let's assume that I get into W&M, and feel free to talk about Cornell, even though it is a reach. What are some advantages/disadvantages? Do the rankings really matter, since they are all closely ranked? Any advise, otherwise?</p>
<p>Ok then, haha I smell unanimity. What about W&M(hearing back from them this week)? If I get in, what factors should I consider between UVA and W&M?</p>
<p>I would say UVA and W&M are pretty similar. UVA is slightly better academically, but the biggest difference is probably size, UVA is quite a bit bigger and is in a bigger town so really personal preference.</p>
<p>W & M is smaller, more undergraduate-oriented, less research-oriented. It has more of a LAC quality than UVA, which is a research 1 university. I think research universities have real advantages for academically serious undergraduates (I went to Cornell myself back in the day) because your professors are actively engaged in cutting-edge research and often bring their work into the classroom. The presence of PhD students can be energizing to the undergraduate majors as well: there are always visiting scholars giving lectures and so on. However, the downside of UVA will be larger introductory courses. Tons of people take the basic economics sequence because it’s a required prerequisite for the McIntire School of Business. As you get further into an econ major, classes will be smaller.</p>