<p>I think it is interesting that the SAT wants to modernize the vocabulary on the test. The two words offered by way of examples are "synthesize" and "empirical" - both science related. Is TCB signalling its intent to favor science and engineering over liberal arts and humanities? If you consider the list of words that will be left on the cutting room floor - words that are deemed "outdated" - you will come to the glaring conclusion that it will soon be a total waste of time for students to read anything that was written prior to the 20th century. Goodbye Charles Dickens, Jane Austen, Bronte sisters and their contemporaries. TCB wants you to know that you are no longer required to understand the language of these great classics as they are no longer relevant in today's universities/workplace. I suppose it is a valid point to suggest that Literature is a worthless pursuit when it comes to job security. Please forgive my disquietude as I lament the beauty of words that will soon fall into desuetude. I look forward to seeing Mr. Khan's list of "relevant" words. I can't wait to see the face of our language and brush up on my English!!!</p>
<p>Considering how few esoteric SC problems appeared in CR, I don’t think it’s a good idea to take out the vocab. It hasn’t been a thrill studying vocabulary, but I’m glad that the SAT has spurred me to do so. My reading comprehension and writing have improved.</p>
<p>I don’t support making the SAT vocab easier to identify. </p>
<p>It’s better to learn more and then utilize more, IMO.</p>