<p>Now I am confused, why exactly are we arguing over the fact that its only a business degree from wharton, its a business school, so obviously people will receive one degree, and again their specific pursuit can be different. I fail to see how it is a negative for someone interested in business to only be able to get one degree in business.</p>
<p>Yes at HYPSM it is easier to switch majors, but that isn’t a product of Wharton, that is how Penn is set up. It is also difficult at Penn to go from CAS to SEAS. So the actual structures of the university account for the feasibility of changing majors, something that you can’t really fault Wharton for. And even if we follow your argument that switching from Wharton is much harder, it actually isn’t. I have repeatedly read that the only really hard transfer at Penn is going into Wharton, not out. If you are in Wharton, you can pretty much go to the other schools at will. And of course there is the possibility of a dual degree, and again from what I have read, this is much easier at Penn than HYPSM. </p>
<p>Maybe this argument has gone on too long, but I am starting to lose sight of what exactly is being argued. So let me summarize my position.</p>
<p>Whartonites are people with passion for business, just as engineers are people with a passion for building something. One person enjoys constructing a diversified portfolio, the other wants to build a bridge, but both are doing something they want to do. Does money play a role, yeah, it definitely does, but is it all important, no. For you to assume that all Whartonites are simply there for the money is ludicrous, business is a field of study. Even Zuckerberg had money on his mind, if he was truly all about the social revolution, he would only try to make profits for covering overhead costs, I highly doubt that’s what he is up to. Again, money is not an all powerful motivator.</p>
<p>I guess since you haven’t mentioned it anymore, you have realized that business is a difficult field, or at least on par with any other field, so that argument wins out, I don’t see you countering your sufficient and necessary claim. </p>
<p>As to the whole Whartonites not pursuing other possibilites, its a moot point, you can’t prove that all wharton kids are finance geeks, and while we have put forth examples that certain kids definitely do not only pursue finance, they are as you stated cases, not generalizations. Although I would tend to lean more towards the fact that a majority of Wharton students do explore liberal arts. </p>
<p>I want to go back and address your claim about 17 year olds not knowing what to do with their lives. You use Google, Yahoo, Facebook and other companies to say that HYPSM is superior, but those people who founded those companies, knew what their field of interest was since they were teenagers, therefore countering your own statement. Sure most of us here are in our late teens, that doesn’t mean we are totally incapable of knowing our interests and having a passion for a specific thing.</p>
<p>Overall, I don’t really see the reason for your distaste of Wharton, is it the best school in the world, no, is it a school on the level of HYPSM, most definitely. I think you need to just come to terms with the fact that some people find business interesting, I know I do, and also that people are a lot deeper than monetary gain.</p>