<p>^^ You’re right. That Nermal was better.</p>
<p>^^Ugh…</p>
<p>Nermal went to MIT. So Nermal is clearly better.</p>
<p>Well that solves the Affirmative Action crisis. All problems can be solved based on who went to MIT.
Is there a God? Only if he went to MIT.</p>
<p>Where the Devil go?</p>
<p>Princeton, obviously.</p>
<p>I supported McCain, definitely the better of the two.</p>
<p>Anyway, I hope you people find your brains, you seem to have lost them.</p>
<p>And he was only in the 50th percentile. And a history major.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Maybe he should have went to MIT and been an engineer, then he’d be t3h bestestest!</p>
<p>But only an engineer in the top 10%.
The top 10.5% doesn’t count.</p>
<p>What about the top 10.1%?</p>
<p>Good question. What if there are three MIT engineers in the top 10%? Who’s better? There’s Nermal, God and Scooby.</p>
<p>Does Nermal > Scooby?</p>
<p>Scooby > everyone. He doesn’t need to be an MIT engineer in the top 10%.</p>
<p>If an engineer is all alone in the forest and places in the top 10% of his class at MIT, does he make a sound?</p>
<p>hey ma if you can see me nowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww im arms open wide on the starboard bowwwww
yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaa</p>
<p>What if an MIT engineer in the top 10% became a strung out hooker? Are they still better? or did they lose their betterness? And if it’s lost, who gets to be better now?</p>
<p>
He’s screaming about how he’s the most awesome, but nobody ears are awesome enough to pick up his frequency.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Scooby is still better. Scooby is better than everyone and nobody can deny that.</p>
<p>Engineers don’t go in the forest</p>
<p>…</p>