<p>Colorado Mom, thanks for the link–that book looks interesting.</p>
<p>GTalum, your nephew does indeed sound very similar to me and my son (me especially). Your story underlines my concern that sort of shepherding them along can only go so far. Or maybe if you live long enough, you can do it for their post-school career too? Sounds kind of crazy, but with the longevity people enjoy today, maybe that could work.</p>
<p>Marsian, fair point on my daughter’s story. She clearly has no interest in playing music whatsoever. But when it comes to reading, she is supposed to read X number of pages per month, and always logs some insane multiple of X instead. (We would like her to read more challenging material, though, as she plows through hundreds of pages a day but it’s all in the vein of that “Warriors” series.)</p>
<p>Oldfort, I salute you for being so accommodating. I always felt like I had a lot to offer if I ever would have encountered someone like you.</p>
<p>GTalum (later post), thanks for the kudos. But I find it interesting that you say your nephew “does not have ADHD, is bright and engaging, but continues to lack work ethic”. Are you sure he does not have ADHD? I can see that some people might dispute the idea of ascribing a psychological syndrome to people who are “bright but lazy”; but if you accept the validity of the DSM definition of ADHD-Inattentive, it’s hard for me to imagine that your nephew could be so similar to me and my son but not qualify.</p>
<p>CrowLady, thanks for the props. So you are saying you married your college boyfriend, and then had a child together who takes after your husband? It’s interesting how the “slacker-striver couple” (in which the slacker is almost always the guy, and the striver the girl) has become so much more common in movies, and perhaps IRL (my wife and I certainly qualify). </p>
<p>This is such an interesting and fraught area for those of us who are interested in the fundamental nature of cognition. Traditionally, there was (and still very often is) a moral judgment attached to this personality type. In some ways, we “smart but lazy” people were/are seen as the worst of all. We “could”, but “don’t”. We “waste” our intellectual talent. We “lack work ethic”, we “underachieve”, we are soft and decadent, wallowing in our hedonism.</p>
<p>So, okay, maybe that’s true. But <em>why</em> are we like this? Why do we not muster more effort? We were just born bad? (Or if not “bad”, just not as good and morally upright as the more industrious among us?) Would it really be just as easy for us to be ambitious and hard working as it is for the, well, ambitious and hard working? Then why don’t we choose it? What is “grit and determination” made of, when you get down to it? I don’t have any easy answers, because I recognise that one can go down this path so far that you excuse any behaviour. Perhaps most troubling is not so much to excuse the actions of really sick serial killers (where it is easier to accept that there is something seriously psychologically wrong); but I am never going to be able to give a pass to someone who is needlessly cruel and “******y” to people around him; so why should I get a pass either? </p>
<p>I guess though that I do see a difference between active cruelty and “douchiness” and the tendency to find it hard to muster up effort to stop “slacking”. I can’t really judge as I can’t live in someone else’s mind along with my own (though that goes both ways for everyone else as well); but I strongly suspect that it takes a lot more mental effort for me to stay “on task” than it does for a lot of other people. I feel like stuff that other people treat as pretty routine (working a 9 to 5 office job for instance) feels akin to having to go work a double shift in a coal mine (and that if I actually did find myself in the situation where I had to work in a coal mine or as an agricultural labourer to survive, I would simply not survive, full stop, end of story). If that makes me a subpar human being, so be it.</p>