<p>I generally agree with Hoyasaxa1’s description of the strengths of the undergraduate program at Hopkins except that he failed to mention the perhaps surprising strength of the humanities departments.</p>
<p>With respect to Hoyasaxa1’s description of the con’s, I think he accurately described how many undergrad’s would list them, although I personally think that they are frequently overblown. </p>
<p>It is probably fair to say that Baltimore is not the best college town, and as a city does not compare favorably to Boston, NYC, or DC. It is more comparable to Philadelphia but, overall, Philadelphia is also a better city. If the Homewood campus were in DC as opposed to Baltimore, Hopkins would be as selective as Harvard. So perhaps you should be happy it is not </p>
<p>That said, Baltimore does have its share of charms and, if you maintain a positive attitude, it not only is tolerable but can be quite enjoyable. There are beautiful areas and neighborhoods, good restaurants and clubs, fine cultural facilities, etc. Yes, it has more than its share of bad neighborhoods which need to be avoided. This admittedly is harder to do at the medical campus in East Baltimore which may be coloring Hoyasaxa1’s view. But if you learn the geography and develop some urban street smarts (which are also necessary for DC, by the way), there is no reason for Homewood’s location to be a major con.</p>
<p>The emphasis on graduate education is often overstated and can often be a positive. There are more than twice as many undergraduates as graduate students at Homewood and undergraduates are not ignored by the administration as they frequently suggest. I was both an undergrad and a graduate student at Hopkins and I can assure you that grad students often think that they are second fiddle to undergraduates since most of the latter pay tuition and most of the grad students do not. Sure, faculty for the most part prefer to work with graduate students but I don’t know of a decent research university where the opposite is true. The positive part is that advanced undergraduates who become accomplished in their field and who demonstrate real interest are treated much like graduate students. I suppose one can argue that Hopkins’ strengths in research and graduate education put pressure on undergraduates to specialize too early. But it is certainly possible to stay general and obtain a first rate, broad liberal arts education at Hopkins, and many do. </p>
<p>The student body is hard working and competitive in the sense that most people want to do well to get into top graduate and professional schools. You will find some laid back students but, make no mistake, this is a place where academics are the priority. Fun can be (and often is) had, but it takes a back seat to academics. But most students want it that way; that’s why they came here.</p>
<p>As for the comment about Hopkins being the “2d choice school for many,” I guess that depends on what you mean by many. About 1/3 of the class is admitted ED so it clearly was #1 for them. And it was #1 for enought RD admits that I think it is accurate to say that more than half of the class had Hopkins as their #1 choice. But certainly, you will find many RD admits who wanted to go to Harvard, Yale, Princeton or Stanford. But that’s also true at other top schools not named Harvard, Yale, Princeton or Stanford. I’m not sure why that’s a con. </p>
<p>Hopkins is more science oriented than many of its peers in that 2/3 of the students are either science or engineering majors. But students majoring in the humanities and social sciences are treated to small classes with brilliant faculty in highly ranked departments. What’s wrong with that? Similarly, while it is true that most Hopkins undergraduates are pre-professional as opposed to preparing for academic careers, the same is true for all of Hopkins’ peer institutions. Hopkins does have a higher percentage of pre-meds than other places, so if you prefer the company of lawyers or business executives, I suppose that might be viewed negatively.</p>