<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Here we go:</p>
<p>I have one first-authorship that was presented at the MRS conference/proceedings, several co-authorships on MRS, ACS, and international conference presentations (various research topics, various groups, but they all fall under my general "research specialization" category), and some first-authorships and awards at rather undergraduate-oriented journals, conferences, etc.</p>
<p>However, I do not have a "real" (whatever that means) publication at a SCI-indexed journal yet. (ie. Nano Letters, Applied Physics Letters)</p>
<p>I used to think my "research experience/accomplishment" is impressive, enough to overcome my rather not-very-confident GPA, at least not a guaranteed-top5 grad school quality. Now I am not so sure.</p>
<p>I guess what I am asking is whether my research accomplishment (eight itemized individual presentations/publications) would be something that is "typical" of those who apply to top5 schools.</p>
<p>Another way to put this question: do you have to have a SCI-indexed JOURNAL publication to stand out in the application process, or are things like MRS Conf. noteworthy for, say, MSE majors?</p>
<p>I don't think there are many undergrads who are primary authors at MRS, but I could be wrong.</p>
<p>Any thoughts, personal opinions would be helpful. (to ease my severe post-submission-and-pre-decision-anxiety and panic attack)</p>
<p>Merry Christmas!!!</p>
<p>P.S. having not-super-proud GPA and great everything else, let me just say that i'd rather have rock-solid GPA and mediocre everything else...</p>