<p>I reread the article, and what some here fail to discuss is that these kids are working to cover something like car insurance</p>
<p>many kids work for real life expenses, to me a car is a luxary, my kids don't have their own cars</p>
<p>so, is it somehow so noble to work to cover an expense for a luxary in many cases, or to work because it is a family neceseity? all this talk, in the article about travel being not really able to teach life lessons is hogwash, as well as the idea that those that don't work don't know about tedium or working through boredom</p>
<p>I guess what irks me about the article is that it sees work as cute and novel ,and character building, while disparaging other types of programs...well, seems in most cases of the kids they interviewed, the work wasn't done because they had too, as was the case when I was younger, but to pay for car insurance, cell phones</p>
<p>look at the Jobs these paid kids have, and then look at the volunteer work, does that volunteer work look so easy? do we really think being an ambulance responder is learning less about life then the icecream scooper?</p>
<p>that is what the article implies and that somehow the "unwillingness" to get a full time job working at the mall is horrid, but the work at an alzheimer office is being lazy....</p>
<p>sorry, it gets my blood going- my Ds friend have paid jobs, and you know what...each and everyone of them got the job through family connections as did most of the kids I know</p>
<p>one kid worked for A&F and just stood their looking handsome for 6 weeks, and his life lesson was what exactly</p>
<p>I am not disparaging work, but the assumption of the article and the adcoms quoted that somehow other activities just aren't worthy</p>