<p>I'd like to jump in about the UT vs A&M thing that surfaced a few pages back....</p>
<p>First of all, I am a senior at one of the most rigorous, intense private schools in my city. There are less than 40 kids in our graduating class, which means the top 10% is....3 people: The val(me), the sal, and one more.</p>
<p>There are kids at my school with 2.8 GPAs but 1300+/1600 SAT scores. It's that hard.</p>
<p>Now, here's the deal: every year a bunch of kids go to UT, and a bunch of kids go to A&M.</p>
<p>At my school, which is definitely not representational of the general population, the UT kids are almost ALWAYS in the top half of the class, while the A&M kids are almost always in the bottom half.</p>
<p>Why? A&M has never rejected a single student from our school. Never. Even kids who are failing two classes and have Cs in all the rest get into A&M. This year, their representative came to our school, practically begged us to come, and stops by WEEKLY to see if any students have application materials that she can personally deliver to the admissions office.</p>
<p>UT never does that. They've rejected plenty of kids from our school who weren't top 10%. Now, is that fair? Aren't the kids in the bottom 25% of my school probably "smarter" and "more capable" than a top 10%er out in the middle of nowhere?</p>
<p>Yes, but that doesn't change the fact that A&M lets those kids from my school in, while UT rejects them.</p>
<p>So, in conclusion, I know plenty of kids who have been "forced" to choose A&M because they got rejected from UT. Some don't even apply to UT, because they know they won't get in with their GPA.</p>