Sorry if I am posting in the wrong location.
Looking at several threads, it seems like the word grade inflation is floating around. It seems as if you have a 4.0 but below a 26 ACT, then your school has inflated grades. Somehow, this seems quite counterintuitive. I know what “grade inflation” is , but it just doesn’t seem realistic.
The words “you got a 27 on the Math ACT, but you got an A in Calc 1 and 2 at a community college, there scores must be inflated.”
or another example “you got a 26 in ACT english and an A in AP lang, that means your grades are inflated.” have been implied through my threads. I do not see the value in these phrases.
What does this come from? I know of super preppy schools which are amazing which grade harshly. I got a 5 on both my AP tests and had 2 A’s in the classes. Were they extremely difficult? No, Did they have to be? No, my teachers explained the core concepts and gave us enough work to enlighten us. We did not have boatloads of homework, or extremely harsh tests. Of course we practiced for the tests.
So, is “grade inflation” basically the same as saying, “I go to a very expensive school, that is prestigious and expensive, and my teachers grade harshly. I have a lower gpa than you, but because my classes were harder, I am better than you or my gpa means the same.”
It seems like it is very pretentious, to call something “grade inflation”, when in reality that is normal at a public school. I do not see why so many see a correlation between the SAT and ACT and intelligence. The phrase you only got a “20 something on the act, and your gpa is really high, that means your school is inflating their grades.” is really quite ridiculing. It is basically saying that since you are not good at a test, you can not be a scholar.