<p>Logic you again point out your misunderstanding of capitalism. Monopolies are very rare in capitalism, though rarly they are possible. Now the reason why they are rare is that for a monopoly to form it really has to be doing the right thing for everybody(customers, workers, etc) if they don’t do things right then market forces will be against them and they will most likely loose to competition. In pure capitalism there is no suppression of competition, so if company A is a monopoly and they change there policy’s against what market forces dictate, then a infinite amount of other companies B-Z will show up delivery the product or service that the market(customers, workers) want. So it is really rare for a monopoly to exist in pure capitalism, but if one did we would want it and accept it, as they are really doing right by market standards.</p>
<p>You mention that government regulation is what breaks up monopolies, in which you are again mistaken. I guess you have forgotten about all of the Monopolies the governments have allowed, created and needed such AT&T. I use AT&T as a basic example though there are many more, like US Steel, MS, Joint Commission, NFL, MLB, etc. Now all of these are used or created by the government to control or enhance a sector. AT&T is a good example because in the earlty1900’s when the telecom networks were spreading across America, it was the US government whom increased regulation to curb competition which would then force AT&T to control all the networks and have only one network protocol/standard. The government didn’t want multiple networks going around the country, so they allowed , supported and needed monopoly. </p>
<p>In fact its actually government regulation that always keeps competition down, and this is a main reason why big companies lobby for regulation. When bigger companies merge, they ask for more regulation in the interest of the customer, but thats just BS, you need to see through it. </p>
<p>I can go forever about this stuff.</p>
<p>Actually Marx distinctly states what pure communism is in one of his books, I forget which. il have to look it up. It has to do with the absence of any capitalistic society’s and no money.</p>