<p>So what is it that constitutes a good applicant?</p>
<p>For two years in a row, my endeavors have not been met with success. </p>
<p>What could I have done better?</p>
<p>My grades are decent, as I have more A's than B's in an unconventional grading system.</p>
<p>I achieved a 2325 (99 percentile) on the SSAT, after spending half a year making and learning vocabulary from flashcards.</p>
<p>I suspect my teacher recommendations are quite strong, as my teachers all seem to have rather positive impressions of me.</p>
<p>My interviews went very well, especially since I had already gone through the application process once, and knew what to say.</p>
<p>My ECs aren't too shabby, I have three commitments that I am interested in and willing to continue if they were available. </p>
<p>I cannot say anything for my essays, since I have not seen any other essays, but I suspect they are far more introspective and philosophical than most others, since that is the kind of person I am.</p>
<p>What could I have done better?</p>
<p>I did all I could to increase my 'strength' as an applicant, including working hard everything I could (essays, SSAT) and tried my hardest in school, developing better work habits and improving as a person.</p>
<p>Yet for all my toil, I once again have reaped no harvest.</p>
<p>So, what is it that constitutes a good applicant?</p>
<p>/end rant</p>