<p>You are asserting something as a psychological fact. So…no a matter of opinion.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>This isn’t true. Happiness is the emotion that results from knowing that you’ve achieved something worthwhile. It’s not the worthwhile thing, in and of itself.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>But this doesn’t make psychological sense.</p>
<p>By making happiness our ultimate goal, you’ve de facto defined success as “something that brings happiness” (since success is, more concretely, the accomplishment of some aim/purpose — and happiness is apparently the supreme/over-arching one).</p>
<p>However, we only feel happy after we detect that some effort has been successful.</p>
<p>With your de facto definition of success, though, you’ve just argued that feelings of happiness arise…from feelings of happiness.</p>
<p>It would be great if being happy just made you happier in this hedonic positive feedback process that is, er, self-causing. But that’s not how the human mind works.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>and that’s a non sequitor — even if all of our actions were in pursuit of happiness, that would not mean that our actions must therefore be meaningful and unselfish. Indeed, it would mean that humans would be unable to pursue anything besides something meaningless and intrinsically self-oriented.</p>
<p>(Also, you’re admitting that good deeds are good whether they bring happiness or not, suggesting the existence of other values besides hedonic ones.)</p>
<hr>
<p>Our ultimate goal is to create and maintain value. Happiness arises from this activity when it’s going well, but it’s only after we see that something valuable has been created that we feel happiness. Since the feeling comes after the valuable result, then that feeling cannot be the valuable result.</p>

I mean every work I say!</p>
, well travelled, thoughtful, more controlled, more healthy, interesting, caring, closer to G-d, kinder, have developed a personal philosophy, in a stable relationship (with children only if we have external care providers involved). </p>
I am disappoint.</p>