<p>i would say 10% athletics (every school gives scholarships to athletes, even if they say they don't. i've had family members who worked at yale, princeton, and harvard who have confirmed that)
probably 10% on daddy's donation
10% on mommy's donation
another 20 percent whose parents have given decent donations, plus the kids are of above average intelligence </p>
<p>now out of the fifty 'normal' percent
20 percent on hard core scores and grades
20 percent with an incredible EC, like starting a business or something like that
and then 30% qualify as well-rounded students</p>
<p>no they really don’t add up. you only break down 70% of the “normal 50%” …not that I want you to finish, because your post was totally uninformed. if you think 20% of each incoming class is made up of developmental admits, you’re crazy.</p>
<p>total: 1650
about 100-150 athletics
about 100-150 with some kind of extreme talent
about 150-250 academic superstars (scholarly grades, super test scores, stellar recommendations, contest winners, USAMO, Intel etc)
about 50 donation students
about 10-50 VIP cases
about 200-250 alumni children</p>
<p>rest = unhooked allrounders; so about 900 avg. </p>
<p>what’s the point of doing any of what you’re doing? are you really trying to label kids before they even get on campus? just because a kid is a phenomal athlete, does that mean he/she can’t also be an academic superstar or extremely talented? there’s no formula or percentages. and if there are, they would add up to something like 400%. these are people. not statistics.</p>