<p>Collegekid wrote:</p>
<p>The point Jenny, is why would wealthy people want to send their kid to a second tier school? Most wealthy people have access to good private day schools and good public schools. </p>
<p>He went to a top school or stayed at Greenwich High or the private school he's gone to since birth.</p>
<hr>
<p>While we are not without resources, we are not "wealthy", and we don't live in Greenwich, but this was EXACTLY my reasoning for encouraging my daughter to apply only to "reach" schools (five total). If she didn't get in any of them, her private day school here (small, educated college town) would have been a good alternative, and would certainly provide as good an academic experience as she would get at a "second-tier" boarding school. The costs of all the boarding schools are about the same (that is, twice as much as her private day school). From a purely economic perspective, it would make sense that the school needed to be twice as good as her current school. But we really didn't use an economic analysis.</p>
<p>While SHE may have been additionally interested in aspects of boarding school life beyond the cultural and academic opportunities her dad and I cared about (aspects that might have been equally met at a "second tier" school, and by that I mean, social stuff, living away from home, etc. etc.), the sacrifice of giving her up from our home for the next four years, was, to me, significant enough a sacrifice that it had to be a FABULOUS school for me to let her go. That is, in order for us to let her go this young (13), when she is still at a charming age, it had to be for something way, way better than we could give her here. If if was not going to be "fabulous" in all of our books, she could just wait until college for the dorm experience. This is NOT to say that the "second tier" schools are not terrific, and maybe just downright fabulous in someone else's book. It just turned out that the ones I thought were fabulous were "reach schools." Like I said, they needed to be a lot better than her current school, and her current school was really pretty darn great. There's a reason I guess, that they are reaches - the opportunities and facilities and scholars and level of education are all just superb.</p>
<p>How did I determine "fabulous," you ask? By my own Tried and True Scientific Methods - by visiting them, studying people I knew who went to these schools, talking to people about them, succumbing to the lure of the DVDs and viewbooks, tuning up spidey senses, asking a lot of questions and nosing around at the schools, touring athletic, performing arts and other facilities, sitting in on a class or two, checking endowment sizes, and just generally making a pain in the ass of myself. </p>
<p>I will say this also - that in my daughter's case, it was never about Ivy league placement though - she wants to come back to our hometown and attend the university in this city. (How long will this idea last once she goes away? Who knows.) In any event, she would have a better chance at getting into an Ivy being in the top 3% of our local public high school than she would in the top 33% of one of the top boarding schools, I think. (Now that IS based on hard facts - source withhheld unless you PM me.)</p>
<p>(I mentioned this once before, however, that opening five rejection letters would have been emotionally difficult, and for that reason alone, we should have thought about her applying to some safety schools.)</p>