<p>I read somewhere that Chicago has the best econ, and I was wondering where the best MBA programs were. While UC's good, it can't possibly be better than Harvard or Whartons, can it?</p>
<p>Wrong forum, and you don't study econ at an MBA program. </p>
<p>To answer your question -- Chicago has a top ten business school. It is not better than Harvard or Wharton (though it is arguably better for finance than Harvard).</p>
<p>yeah i know, but i was wondering if the fact that chicago had the "the best econ" would translate to a better mba</p>
<p>If a university has a good history department, does that mean it will have a good law school?</p>
<p>best mba programs?</p>
<p>harvard, stanford, yale, wharton</p>
<p>Yeah, with the exception of Yale. It is more of a top 20.</p>
<p>In order, in my opinion (people can argue this order all they want--that's what this site is all about)</p>
<p>Harvard and Stanford (tie for first), Wharton (Penn), Dartmouth, Yale, Chicago, Northwestern, Columbia, UC Berkeley, Duke, UCLA, Michigan, NYU, USC, Virginia, Texas, UNC, Indiana, Wake Forest, Illinois, Purdue</p>
<p>I hate putting my own school , UCLA (where I got my MBA) out of the top 10--but 11 is not too bad, heh?</p>
<p>harvard, stanford, wharton, northwestern, chicago, michigan, berkeley</p>
<p>You forget MIT (Sloan)</p>
<p>I just can't see Yale ahead of Chicago, Kellogg, Columbia, and Sloan in recent years.</p>
<p>yeah, its not.</p>