<p>Is the most "green"?</p>
<p>Harry Potter!</p>
<p>None. They all use paper mail-outs for campaign contributions which leads to trees being decapitated. Case closed.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recycled_paper%5B/url%5D">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recycled_paper</a></p>
<p>I'm so green I can't bear to touch anything that's original production caused harm to the environment.</p>
<p>then how are you using a computer?</p>
<p>Maybe, just maybe, he's using a computer made out of vegetables.</p>
<p>None of them have any care for the enviorment; its a simple fact. For me it doesnt factor in my decision of support as they all have a F rating for enviormental awareness so its left out of my issue range</p>
<p>Obama. He's barely out of diapers.</p>
<p>Ron Paul. Free markets are the best for the environment. </p>
<p><em>waits for eco nuts to spew anti capitalist rhetoric</em></p>
<p>Smiles are best for the environment. And Ron Paul's old. He probably doesn't even know what the environment is.</p>
<p>As a Young Democrats official, I'd have to say whoever of the Democratic candidates wins the primary will be my candidate. But personally, I'd support either Obama (not hillary because i personally do NOT like it when we get into presidential dynasties, I do not trust a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton succession dynasty line AT ALL in terms of fairness), Joe Biden, Giuliani, or Michael Bloomberg (Bloomberg is my person idol, I hope someday to become just as great as he is ^_^)</p>