Which has the better history department: Amherst or Williams?

<p>I have been accepted to both schools early write. So now, I am trying to decide between them. I intend to major in history and possibly double major with biology. In terms of prestige, I know they are equal. I have already compared Williamstown to Amherst (town), and prefer Amherst because it seems to be livelier and has more college students. However, Williams has an advantage because I think the first year housing is better. Overall I feel like I prefer, Williams for reasons I can?t explain, although I haven?t visited either school and do not know a lot about either. However, before I make a decision I need to compare their history departments. Which school has a better history department? Thanks in advance.</p>

<p>No difference. Visit both and see which one you like more.</p>

<p>I agree with slipper - the history departments at both schools are excellent and this should not be the basis to pick between these schools. I think Williams has a slight edge in the sciences. You really should visit both schools and see which one you prefer. I think the Wms/Amherst campuses have slightly different feels to them. (I'm a Wms alum).</p>

<p>I would decide more on the social than housing aspect.</p>

<p>But you have to visit them.</p>

<p>Amherst Freshman housing is hit or miss. Next year it will be a lot better and likely good for everyone (they're completing renovations). James and Stearns are gorgeous, though.</p>

<p>LN, Congratulations on two fine choices! Comparing Williams and Amherst on the basis of their history departments would be splitting hairs. I would give Williams the edge in sciences, but not to the extent of being a deal breaker.</p>

<p>There is a good deal of overlap in the general type of student who attends both schools as well. Generally speaking, these are happy, energetic kids. So, what will be the deciding factor? Most likely it will be the physical environment -- will you fit better in a lively small town or an insular mountain village? </p>

<p>The firstyear entry system IS a plus for Williams. Other points of differentiation are Winter Study and the Tutorial program. I'd also give Williams positive marks if you're involved in the arts -- museums, musical and theater performance opportunities.</p>

<p>Good luck and let us know how you feel after your visits. Gut reaction will be a big part of this decision (or just as you say "reasons you can't explain"). At the end of the day, you don't need to explain.</p>

<p>Amherst also has special topics courses though, and a rich offering of interterm possibilities (courses, fellowship opportunities, internships...) It's seriously a win-win situation, I was in it last year.</p>

<p>History is a large department, and a strong one, at both. One thing I'd recommend is to browse through both schools' course catalogs to get a sense of which appears to offer more courses that sound interesting to you. But really, far more important is the overall vibe you get from the school and especially from other students. I'd say try to stay overnight at both and then go with your gut. Academically, socially, prestige-wise, they really are even in every way. Most people choose one over the other for reasons that are difficult to articulate.</p>