<p>"Which numbers? How about the number of Andover kids on the International Physics Olympiad team (twice as much as TJ)? Or how about the numbers that show that no one has sent more kids to Harvard, Yale, and Princeton in the past four years? Or what about the number of Andover alumni who are Presidents, Senators, Nobel Laureattes, etc etc? Weird how TJ hasn't blown us out of the water yet..."</p>
<p>"Wow. SHow me the Physcis Olympiad numbers please. Also, how about SAT and AP scores? You say numbers don't mean anything, and then you talk about them. To attend Andover, you have to have some sort of money AND be smart, for the most part. For TJ, you have to be smart. For Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, you also have to have money."</p>
<p>The American team sent to Barcelona for the International Physics Olympiad consisted of 5 people- 2 from Andover: Daniel Whalen, Nicolas Fortino, and 1 from TJ: Menyoung Lee. Last time I checked, 1+1=2 and 1x2=2. Check the Ipho site if you don't believe me. </p>
<p>And please stop making ridiculous statements like: "To attend Andover, you have to have some sort of money AND be smart, for the most part... For Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, you also have to have money." Only 40% of the kids here pay full tuition, so to say that one gets into Andover off of money is completely preposterous. To say you need money to get into Harvard, Yale, and Princeton is equally preposterous. You're entire arguement against Andover seems to be based on the fact that we're full of "rich legacy kids" whom you argue are just flat out stupider than their TJ counterparts.</p>
<p>"LOL. Ok, buddy. so $100,000 dosen't make Adcoms raise eye bro, huh?"</p>
<p>No it doesn't. You cannot buy an admissions spot with $100,000. We have a $500 million endowment. $100,000 is like spare change. </p>
<p>"if your trying to argue that Andover is not a great school, you're wrong. Just search "Andover" on this board and you'll find out why."</p>
<p>"Show me where I said that."</p>
<p>You never said that directly, but then again I'm not quite sure what your point was in the first place, since your post consisted of taking things I said and then rebutting them. The statements I made at the end of my last post were made because I really wasn't sure what your point was, but it was implied that since you keep mentioning that say, "Andover has money, which makes it look a lot better than it is." that I figured you had some problem with Andover, or at least don't give it the credit it deserves, which explains my subsequent post. </p>
<p>But since you keep mentioning money let's take this into consideration: TJ draws primarily from students who live in Great Falls/McLean area, or from the Vienna area (Longfellow and Kilmer students make up more than half of the student body in any given class). Those areas are the richest areas of the richest county in America. I'm willing to bet that the average student at TJ is almost as rich if not just as rich as the average student at Andover. The median income of the student at Andover would be very similar to the median income of a student at TJ. TJ is not some ghetto-ass school that takes kids off the streets and turns them into international mathletes. </p>
<p>"Just face the fact that TJ can blow Andover away in adademics, period. Adover has a lot of money, which is good and important, but it does not make it's students smarter. As far as sending kids to HYP, that also takes money and Andover costs money, so I think you see the coneection there. And as far as prominet Alumni, Andover is much, much older than TJ so it's really not fair to compare that. Once again, TJ blows Andover out of the freakin water in numbers/ academics, but Andover has money, which makes it look a lot better than it is."</p>
<p>Again, stop with the whole money argument. Ask anyone on the Harvard, Yale, or Princeton boards if your family income makes a difference makes a difference to the admissions commitee. Maybe if you buy them a math building, or build them a stadium, sure, but their not going to add up your income and be like "Hey this guy makes xyz amount of money but this guy only makes zyx lets let in guy 1". Sorry I just fail to see any "coneection" between the fact that Andover costs money (tuition, yes, but admission does not cost money) and sending kids to HYP takes money (again, they have a tuition, so yes you would most likely pay money to send your child to HYP but no admissions is not something most people straight up BUY). </p>
<p>""TJHSST has fielded more National Merit Semifinalists than any other high school in America for most of the 1990s and 2000s. From 2000 to 2005, it fielded more USAMO qualifiers than any other high school in America and has a distinguished history of U.S. Physics Olympic Team members and medal winners."</p>
<p>National Merit Semifinalists: test. USAMO qualifiers: test. FCPS school system preps kids for tests like crazy and especially TJ, but the fact of the matter is there is more to high school than testing. At Andover, we really don't care that much about how well we do on tests. US Physics Olympiad: yes very nice not taking anything away from that. Andover also has a distinguished history of Ipho competitors.</p>
<p>"TJHSST was recently ranked as the top public high school in the nation by PrepReview. TJHSST also has the highest average SAT score among American high schools. Each year, over a quarter of its graduating class accepts admission to the University of Virginia. Other popular destinations among graduates include the College of William and Mary, Virginia Tech, Duke University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Carnegie Mellon University, Harvard University, Yale University, and Stanford University."</p>
<p>College placement? Again, we send 15% of our kids to HYP and what? 33% to Ivys+MIT and Stanford? All our college placement numbers are better than TJ. This whole statement does not even touch Andover, don't try and "blow it out the freakin water" with that. </p>
<p>"For schools with more than 1,000 students, TJHSST was cited as having the highest-performing AP Biology, AP Calculus BC, AP Chemistry, AP English Language and Composition, AP French Language, AP Government and Politics: U.S., AP Psychology and AP U.S. History courses among all schools worldwide in its size range. No school had a greater proportion of its student body succeed in these subjects..."</p>
<p>Yes, and they didn't that Andover has the highest performing AP physics scoring and probably some more as well that we just simply don't care enough about to mention. Our courses prepare you to take the AP exam, if you want, but that's not their primary purpose. It's to learn. </p>
<p>"If test scores don't make a good school, what does? And Adover does have a lot of rich kids so don't try to shake that one off. Also, there are most definately average/ below average people there, but acting like the majority isn't above average is insane."</p>
<p>A lot more than test scores make a good school, and your implication that it DOESN'T take more than test scores is simply ignorant. We have a lot of rich kids, sure, I don't see why that's an issue. We have a lot of poor kids, too. TJ does not have a lot of poor kids, though. In a Washington Post article I saw over the summer, that compared income of public schools to their test scores TJ came out on top in both. Only 1% of TJ students received free or reduced lunches. And no, there are not a lot of "definately average/ below average people" at Andover, and "acting like the majority isn't above average is insane." is definitely not... oops looks like you just said that "acting like the majority of Andover students are NOT above average is insane" Yes, for once we agree, my friend, that is quite insane. Funny how you contradicted yourself there...</p>
<p>"Average SAT's for TJ: 739-V 756-M = 1495
Average SAT"s for Andover: 697 verbal 691 math= 1388</p>
<p>More than 100 points seperates the two. So, as you can see, TJ obiouvsly is a better college prep school."</p>
<p>Yes, TJ performs wonderfully on the SATs, I have a lot of respect for that. But quite frankly leaping to such a huge statement that, "More than 100 points seperates the two. So, as you can see, TJ obiouvsly is a better college prep school" is just utterly preposterous. There is so much more to high school than SAT scores. Please realize this. I saw a list that the TJ class of 05 put up, and it showed the applicants GPA and SAT scores and ECs and then what colleges they applied to and were accepted at. A kid with a 1570 went to Randolph-Macon from TJ! SATs are not everything, please you have to realize this...</p>
<p>"EVERYONE at TJ is SMART and they get in because of their intellect, nothing else. "</p>
<p>The fact that they let in kids purely on academics, troubles me, since there is more to a person than their test scores and grades. At Andover we bring in athletes, artists, kids from around the globe and the country. They're all smart, its just we don't don't see the need to get the "smartest" per say, student body we can. Academics are not everything in one's life.</p>
<p>"TJ offers way more classes, they have a super computer (among other things), and people come from everywhere to come to TJ."</p>
<p>Now, let's get your facts straight on this one, please. TJ does NOT offer "way more classes". Our course offerings are literally in the hundreds. Go to <a href="http://www.andover.edu%5B/url%5D">www.andover.edu</a> and check academics if you don't believe me. People come from everywhere to go to Andover and I mean EVERYWHERE not, "hey he's from loudon county" everywhere I mean "he's from Bahrain" everywhere.</p>
<p>"The only thing is it's about 55% white (I'm not sure about Andover), but that's because they don't let people who aren't smart in just because they are a URM."
Andover is 70% white and TJ is 98% white and asian. Don't argue that TJ is more racially diverse than Andover that simply isn't true.</p>