<p>What I mean is, which of these three schools had the highest yield rate for early applicants? w/o legacies or urm</p>
<p>-Wharton ED
-Columbia ED
-Yale EA</p>
<p>Sry if it's already on the forum, but I can't find it. Thanks.</p>
<p>They all have those statistics on their websites. Look them up. No one except the schools themselves know what the yield is without legacies or URMs, because the colleges don't break those applicants out of the statistics. All you'll get are guesses.</p>
<p>I checked CB, and it didn't say. Just check the sites, as Chedva said.</p>
<p>It's not easier, by the way. The higher admit rates is simply because the early pools tend to be much more self-selective.</p>
<p>I would think Columbia ED.</p>
<p>oh, for the legacies or urm, i mean that i don't have those. and ik it's not necessarily easier, but i just wanted to know the admit rates</p>
<p>I think Columbia for sure..</p>
<p>It depends where in Columbia (College is harder compared to Fu).</p>
<p>Probably Columbia. It accepted about 24% of its ED students this year. Wharton itself is incredibly selective. And since EA doesn't lock in accepted students like ED, Yale doesn't really have any incentive to accept a large percentage of EA applicants, since it doesn't necessarily increase the yield rate.</p>
<p>These threads make me cringe. I hope you're not choosing an ED school based on its admit rate. :eek:</p>
<p>Columbia's ED admit rate (24.5%) was slightly higher than Yale's SCEA admit rate (19.7%). I don't know how many applied to Columbia College ED, so unfortunately I had to combine CC and Fu numbers. </p>
<p>I suspect Yale will receive many more SCEA applications this year because Harvard and Princeton have dropped early admissions.</p>