Which Scenario Is Better?

Graduate School Law School
1

<p>Scenario 1:</p>

<p>Four-years of college is complete. Degree Requirements have been met. UGPA is 3.33. Your LSAT score is 170. You're now eligible to apply for graduation to receive a BS in Finance; however, for top law school admission purposes, you decide to declare a second major so that you can be able to increase UGPA to a 3.5 or so, and postpone graduation to the following year. After completion of that additional year, your UGPA is now a 3.5 and you then decide to apply to a top notch law school.</p>

<p>Scenario 2:</p>

<p>Four-years of college is complete. Degree Requirements have been met. UGPA is 3.33. Your LSAT score is 170. You're now eligible to apply for graduation to receive a BS in Finance. Additionally, you enroll into your institution's graduate program (4+1)to complete a Master of Finance for just one additional year. After completion of graduate program, you've performed well and you then decide to apply to a top notch law school. Mind you, your UGPA is still a 3.33.</p>

<p>These are scenarios I've devised that I would like for you wonderful people to answer to influence my decision. Essentially, is it better to take additional college courses for an additional year to better UGPA or would the graduate program seem more impressive?</p>

2

<p>Stats trump soft factors, so the higher GPA will definitely be better, purely in terms of admissions.</p>

3

<p>But I thought that for LSAC purposes they don't count Masters grades.</p>

4

<p>A bit more responses please.</p>

5

<p>baby turn around...let me see that sexy body go BUMP BUMP BUMP! Seriously ya'll, which scenario is better? I would really like to know.</p>