<p>Boys, you started it.</p>
<p>Ok, Ill start then. My real problem is that every private school it seems like the majority of guys think that they are entitled to something b/c their Daddy owns a yaht (sry, prep school guys) and once boys get the State school they forget how to wash their hair and change their clothing... I need some middle ground please.</p>
<p>Thank you. That is all.</p>
<p>... I see this thread lasting a very long time.</p>
<p>Caltech, MIT, Harvey Mudd, Georgia Tech, Oregon Institute of Technology, Colorado School of Mines, Deep Springs College, Rose Hulman, Drexel, Indian Institute of Technology, ITT Tech, DeVry.</p>
<p>MIT, definetly.
Drexel. Really?</p>
<p>There is so much wrong with this question.</p>
<p>The ones of the lowest academic caliber, probably.</p>
<p>Deep Springs is actually a pretty good point- I know someone there, and he's generally regarded as exceptionally handsome. And while that's only anecdotal evidence, with Deep Springs thats a solid chunk of the population :P</p>
<p>Of course that does girls no good.</p>
<p>UVA for sure ;)</p>
<p>Girls are weird in their preferences. My school is full of heroin-chic super thin metro's...and girls like them cuz a lot of them are French. pz</p>
<p>Yeah, I would think it would be the schools of the lowest academic caliber. Especially ones with big sports programs.</p>
<p>so, schools of the lowest academic caliber have the hottest guys? that insinuates that attractive men are not very smart. which is similar to the common misconception that attractive women are not very smart. and the antithesis of that is that smart men and women are unattractive. i'm sure that you girls like to think of yourselves as both smart and attractive, and maybe you should give men a chance to show you what kind of person they are before you go judging them based on what they look like. after all, you hate it when they do that to you, right? if you ever want to call yourself a feminist, you should know that feminism is about civil rights, and men should be treated with respect as well (even if they dont deserve it, because both men and women have low moments in which they seemingly do not deserve respect.) its all just gross generalization. </p>
<p>you ladies should think about what it says about you that you are so interested in talking about which schools have "hott guys" rather than which schools will give you the best education. college guys will just use you, freshman girls, for sex anyways. just try not to catch a disease, will ya?</p>
<p>UF, because that's where you can find ChamilitaryMayne</p>
<p>
[quote]
you ladies should think about what it says about you that you are so interested in talking about which schools have "hott guys" rather than which schools will give you the best education. college guys will just use you, freshman girls, for sex anyways. just try not to catch a disease, will ya?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>But stereotyping all college guys is okay, right?</p>
<p>are you referring to the average hotness of guys? If thats the case, then WUSTL has the hottest guys because I am the hottest guy in the world and that skews the mean really damn high.</p>
<p>UF, the guys here are so ridiculously good looking (no homo!)</p>
<p>Service academies, specifically the USAFA.</p>
<p>I hate how people say unattractive men are at the lower-end schools. Not true. What women perceive as attractive men are at the higher-end schools. What men perceive as "hot girls" are at the lower-end schools. I, a gay guy, completely agree with the women.</p>
<p>ChamilitaryMayne, why do you say "no homo"? Don't say "homo." Ever. Do people at UF say that a lot?</p>
<p>You obviously have no contact whatsoever with the hip hop community. No homo is a pretty common statement that doesnt mean anything negative.</p>