<p>I recently read a thread on SDN where the difference in “learning styles” between a graduate/PhD track science student and a preclinical MS1 student was discussed by the students who had experiences in both programs. (One of them was in Law School before going to a medical school.)</p>
<p>Here are some of their “opinions” – Read it with a large grains of salt, because some of them (who had gone to the traditional MS/PhD science program before going to a medical school) expressed a quite negative point of view (e.g., master of trivia, half-assed, intellectual bullemia, get in trouble with independent thought and are rewarded by memorizing like a parrot.)</p>
<p>Why are these so negative about the preclinical years for these non-traditional medical school students who used to be on the graduate school science track? Were they forced to abandon their “physical science” learning style and adopt some new one in order to survive in medical school? For the MS3 year, on another thread, one medical student thinks it is similar to the “hazing” experience while joining a frat.</p>
<p>i went to graduate school…last year i finished up in chemical physics. so, this year, my first in MD program, was doable…</p>
<p>however, i feel that my training, which never involved my becoming an encyclopedia or master of trivia, made it difficult. i was always a problem-set kinda guy. getting used to the difference is still difficult. but, i am getting over it. i resisted at first, but i want to know all the medicine i can, so i’m trying hard to change. a big challenge was loss of identity…i became an expert in my field (chemical physics) …only to have entered med school and have my ass kicked by textbook-trained biochemists. so, i really have newfound respect for pre-meds. they work hard, and are very efficient students (efficient in absorbing a massive amount of info and good at putting in enormous number of hours for studying densed materials?)…i am learning how to compile massive amounts of information from them.</p>
<p>Did a PhD before med school in bioengineering. I loved the academic part of my graduate school education. M1 I worked hard but thought it was pretty much BS. M2 was awful. … Had to totaly learn how to binge and purge…which was no easy experience. There was a test or two that I barely got through under the wire. But in the end ended up doing pretty strongly on step 1.</p>
<p>definitely doable but its a learning style you need to pick up. I find that there are some advantages to wrought memorization.
The way I look at it:
grad school way: understand —>eventually know all of the details
Med school way: know all the details —> eventually understand</p>
<p>I graduated from law school and then went to a medical school and found, like the others (who had got MS/PhD first) that it is a detriment to my performance in M1.</p>
<p>Law school and law practice taught me how to think and solve problems not to memorize thousands of useless details, which is what the first two years of medical school is. Memorizing is a skill no doubt but so many of my classmates have what the dean calls intellectual bullemia and will not remember anything beyond the test. When I really learn something, I learn it. But medical school is so rushed that I always feel like I am doing things half-assed.</p>
<p>While the notion is around here that grad school is more independent (i.e., no one tells you what to do, etc), I have found medical school to be more isolated than grad school. Sure, with your project, you’re on your own, but that is how it should be, it’s YOUR project. But other than that, you have a lot of students in the lab willing to help you out, since they have been there before, etc. Medical school is all about finding the most quiet spot in the library to memorize 200 pages of nonsense.</p>
<p>in medical school, all you have to do it show up for tests but graduate students usually have research obligations. In graduate school, independent thought is rewarded. In medical school, you get in trouble with independent thought and are rewarded by memorizing like a parrot.
Another huge leap was the method of learning material. In grad school, you take a concept, and hopefully modify it in some way, to apply it to some novel ideal in science related to your work. Exams test your ability to apply this knowledge in different situations. In medical school, you are given the same material as 150 other students, you read it over and over again, like the 150 other students, and on Friday, you learn who could memorize it the best. After Friday, there is this massive purge of knowledge, and that’s the end of it. There is no intimate relationship b/w you and the material you are learning. This is very frustrating to me.</p>