<p>The pendulum swings both ways. I think there has been a shift in how the newer parents are or are not focused on their kids. My kids span 15 years from oldest to youngest, and I see this very clearly. </p>
<p>So to answer the OP’s question from my viewpoint, there are a number of reasons for this. This is a capitalist country and for those who want to reap the benefits monetarily from that model, it takes hard earned money. When you don’t come from money, you have to work for it, even fight for it. Those early years with my kids involved a lot of that, to buy the better neighborhoods, schools and opportunities that DH and I did NOT have growing up, that I had so coveted. I liked having those things, still do. And education at fine schools was my penchant. You can keep the fancy cars, and fine wines, I liked the schools. </p>
<p>The problem was that the trend was moving that way at the same time. So there were a whole lot of us who felt the same way. Also being the baby boom generation, there were even more of us. When one checks out the fine schools, and the other schools, the whole package is usually a heck of a lot better at those highly selective schools. There has been a snowball effect which occurs when there is interest, a lot of interest in scarce resources, but if you look at the stats, if you are going to pay $65K a year for a school, you get a lot more, better value at the top ones. The grad rates, the facilities, the student satisfaction ,the experience and yes the pananche. Lots of lustre is saying you go to HPY, or your kids does, a lot more than if that H stood for Hyland College, P for Perenso College and Y for Yoring State. </p>
<p>I think your statements are to the extreme though there may be some out there who think exactly along those lines. I know the stereotype parent that is focused on this, to the max, and they still aren’t that rigid. They want a top school, yes, but not necessarily just the top 20, they are scared to death their kids won’t get into a school for which their stats and resume show they could and so they focus on it </p>
<p>I have a friend who counsels kids and packages them for high stakes schools and her business has boomed in the last few years. Her results are good, better than most who don’t use such services, because she does know how to make the 4 years of high school on paper, reduced to stats stand out so the chances are better. I wish I could afford her services, though even if I could have my kids have been too obdurate to toe the line for any advice. </p>
<p>The fin aid aspect and the value for money and prestige are right in there. One of my kids turned down ivy for a tiny no name school that gets a blank look from most folks. Yeah, I wish he’d taken the ivy a lot of times, how much of a difference in the things like opportunity, respect. And as Mary pointed out for those who are looking for good aid packages, the rule pretty much is that top schools have more money. And they have more money for all kinds of things, not just fin aid.</p>