<p>I'm not some kid who just doesn't care about anything. I used to be 5th in my class out of a 1000 or so kids, and my high school is really competitive. I'm like 35th now because I totally don't care and none of this matters at all. </p>
<p>My post asks the question "why is high school important to you personally". Tell me what motivates you to go through it every day, because I totally no longer understand it. However, before you make a generic response, read what I have written below to make sure you are making a cogent argument. I'm asking you guys, because it seems this community would probably have a lot of people who think high school is very important. I challenge all of you to prove me wrong, to prove that school serves a greater benefit than detriment. </p>
<ul>
<li><p>I will honestly never use what I learn in real life. The internet makes learning trivia rather silly. I can look up the rivers in africa, or a physics formula when I need to know them, rather than memorizing them. I could understand it being useful during the early 1900's (when the US education system was designed for the most part) because that was before the advent of the internet, but today it's as useless as your appendix. </p></li>
<li><p>School hardly teaches "skills" or to "think for yourself". Schooling usually represses critical thinking - it emphasizes a "right and wrong answer". Thinking outside of what is pedagogy in english is usually punished with lower grades, math is a series of formulas, history is facts not thinking. Schools usually try to avoid critical thinking anyway - they get rid of philosophy and debate classes because intellectual free thinkers reject the binary pedagagy of the system and undermine their authority.</p></li>
<li><p>People who say it will "help me in college" have circular reasoning - if it is meaningless, now then it is meaningless in college as well. Even if that's not true, hy not go straight to college? </p></li>
<li><p>In addition, the argument "learn history, or history will repeat itself" is bull, history has repeated itself as long as history has been taught. If history is supposed to serve that function, then it has empirically failed so we should cease to use it. If anything, history causes itself to repeat - it allows us to learn the subjectivities of our past as if they are objective to silence criticism and mobilize hate towards "radical" ideologies. Palestinians learn in history how Jews are "vermin". The Japanese learn that the US nuked them "for no reason". We learn that communism and socialism are <em>irredeemably</em> bad, when there is serious argument for the opposite. My history book tells me the ideals of american "democracy", when every political scientist agrees america is a republic and every sociologist agrees that the poor and disenfranchised have little voice in policy over rich corporations and lobbyists. Yet it is the same ideology which allows us to invade other countries to "help" them with these "ideals". History causes itself to repeat. </p></li>
<li><p>canonical english literature does not teach american culture. All attempts to represent culture involve selection, all selection means some things will not be included, and, most often, what is not included is conveniently only not so for political objectives. In other words, we do not learn american culture in english class, and, instead, we learn a very skewed representation of it. For example, we learn poets like Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman wrote about nature, when they wrote almost entirely about sex. </p></li>
<li><p>We don't need math to "do my taxes" or something else in real life. I learned algebra in middle school. That's sufficient. I don't need derivatives or polynomial functions to do that. </p></li>
<li><p>School harms a love of learning. It represses it because you spend hours doing homework and going to school, leaving little time for reading what interests you personally. It was only after I stopped caring about school could I read what interests me. </p></li>
<li><p>The whole career argument has flaws. I might need <em>a very small portion of it</em> in my career but certainly not all of it, or even a sizable amount of it. Even if that's not true, should I give up my life in order to make money? According to psychological studies, if you compare a lottery winner to an average person 6 months after he or she won, there is no difference in happiness between the two. Money has nothing to do with long term happiness. There's probably a negative cost/benefit of fretting about school because school itself is unpleasant and the benefits it achieves are non-existent.</p></li>
</ul>