<p>I continue to be perplexed by the interest that top US colleges and universities have in recruiting and admitting international students into their undergraduate programs. </p>
<p>I am aware that many private preparatory schools got the ball rolling years ago in an attempt, highly successfully, to increase the pool of price insentitive buyers and ventured to places like Japan and Korea. And similarly motivated Boston University, as a specific example, has feasted for years on well-to-do full-paying Middle Eastern and Asian students. So clearly money has been a motivating factor in the past. </p>
<p>Is making one self available to an ever larger pool of price insensitive buyers still the motivation? Is this also a doffing of the cap, yet again, to the idea of "diversity"? If so, aren't there myriad first-generation Americans from every conceivable place on the planet worthy of our attention that meet these diversity requirements? </p>
<p>If, we believe, that education is a scarce good, should we not be satifying the demands of American students first, and not be educating people who will return to their home countries, thus denying us the productivity that results from this education. Shouldn't we be reserving all our financial aid for economically-deserving Americans?</p>
<p>I don't mean to be jingoistic about this, but I have a few questions? Does anyone else?</p>