<p>THat is pathtic. With all the time we have to come on this site and post randomness we should be able to make a decent wikipedia article. Who wants to support the cause?</p>
<p>I think someone's done that before, but they edited the article saying that the forum was populated with tightasses or something and it was deleted. I think it was pretty accurate, though, lol..</p>
<p>Based on the blurb "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Confidential">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Confidential</a> THat is pathtic," I thought the fact that there was a wiki page on CC was pathetic.</p>
<p>Someone asked on the other thread if quoting wiki is reliable?
[quote]
THat is pathtic. With all the time we have to come on this site and post randomness we should be able to make a decent wikipedia article. Who wants to support the cause?
[/quote]
This is why i think it's not.</p>
<p>Lol, I am surprised CC even has a wiki article (truthfully not worth the megadatabase memory...).</p>
<p>Yeah... I remember reading a longer version.</p>
<p>Which was entertaining AND fairly accurate. It talked about logs...</p>