<p>3.97 - with all due respect, things always balance out. </p>
<p>"Many of my teachers do not know how to format letters or what to say. "</p>
<p>You complain about the quality of your teachers at your school and how they are not motivated in helping their students, so I will naturally assume that you go to a somewhat non-competitive school, where the majority of the kids either attend state schools or don't give a damn where they go to college. Correct me if this assumption is HONESTLY wrong (as in don't refute it simply because of what I'm about to say). </p>
<p>You have the following advantages because of your uncompetitive school -</p>
<ul>
<li><p>grade inflation for the top students
Again, with all due respect and not taking away from your hard work, a 3.97 GPA is a LOT easier to obtain at some schools than others. My school is not very competitive either, however it does have VERY difficult top-level classes that weed out everyone but the few top kids in the school (I feel like I'm being weeded out in spanish). Either way, I still have a good rank without working hard for it. On the other hand, there are top public and private schools in which you can work your ass off and MAYBE pull off a B average. Sure, at these schools you'd get awesome recommendations from quality teachers and counselors, but you'd end up with a crappy rank and GPA. It all balances out.</p></li>
<li><p>Less homework
YES, I did read in the middle of that long list that you take four college classes at a top state university. So do a large portion of my friends. At Yale. It doesn't make them any better or smarter than the rest of us. Just pay, and you can take classes there that are not offered at the school. Yes, you'd probably have homework from those college courses that run twice a week or so, but if your school is not as competitive, then the bulk of your work would be from these college classes.</p></li>
<li><p>Less competition for top colleges
Because of how stressed out you are about this, I would assume you're applying to some of the top colleges in the country. From what you have stated about your school, I got the feeling that not many students care so much about their recommendations beside yourself. Naturally, that would mean they're not applying to the same top schools you're applying to. Less applicants from same area, better chances.</p></li>
<li><p>Less competitive for extra-curriculars and leadership spots, etc.
Kids can be like VULTURES at top public schools. Even the competition for worthless officer positions in worthless clubs is insane. (Trust me, my cousin goes to a high school with an average SAT score of 1350) Imagine running for a spot like senior class president in one of THOSE schools.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>Well there are plenty more, but you get my point. I hope I didn't offend, because I was not trying to take away from anything you've accomplished, but trying to put things into perspective a bit. Coming from one of those less-competitive schools myself, I understand the ABSOLUTE need for self-motivation in order to succeed. There are not so many over-achievers around you to rub off of. However, I do not feel sorry for you because there are distinct advantages, college application-wise, of going to a less-competitive high school. I've accepted the disadvantages that may come with it as well: maybe my recommendations won't be as beautifully written, but rightfully, they are not for me to control anyways. So the next time you say,</p>
<p>"You're not trying to balance this with extracurriculars, a part-time job, and homework; I am."</p>
<p>Remember there are kids out there who have to work much harder than you do (than I do as well).</p>